My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31415
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:34 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:00:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/3/1992
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR FEDERAL COAL LEASES
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-19- <br />tabulations and discussions of water rights and mitigation plans are <br />documented in Volumes 5 and 5A. <br />The Orchard Valley mine could potentially damage water rights in three ways. <br />Water for use within the mine is derived from an alluvial well field in <br />Steven's Gulch. Drawdown of this alluvium could affect flows in Steven's <br />Gulch and in the North Fork of the Gunnison. Over a hundred spring-fed or <br />run-off-fed stock ponds, and springs cover the permit area, and many are found <br />in the affected area. Subsidence could affect the structural integrity of <br />these ponds or interrupt flow to springs. Lastly, mine inflows from streams <br />along fractures could diminish adjacent surface water flows. <br />The Orchard Valley Mine proposed to consume approximately 30,000 GPD for use <br />at the mine. In early 1986, they consumed 8700 GPD. This water supply is <br />drawn from a well field which taps the alluvium of Steven's Gulch. The <br />applicant has obtained an approved augmentation plan through Division 4 Water <br />Court to replace water removed from Steven's Gulch. The plan uses releases <br />from East Beckwith No. 1 Reservoir, located in the Anthracite drainage, to <br />compensate for any injury to other vested water rights or, for this purpose, <br />the North Fork alluvium. <br />CWI has designed a mine plan and mitigation plan that provides for protection <br />of water users that could be affected by mining. The mine plan was engineered <br />to exclude arty coal extraction in certain areas underlying adjudicated water <br />rights. Specifically, the north extreme of the lease area is excluded from <br />the mine plan partly to protect water rights in East Roatcap and Terror <br />Creek. In those areas that will be mined limited coal extraction will occur <br />where overburden depth is less than 800 feet. This will minimize the chance <br />of subsidence effects, In areas where overburden depth is greater than 800 <br />feet, subsidence impacts are not predicted. The extraction plan is designed <br />to protect pipelines, stream channels, and adjudicated springs, seeps and <br />ponds. A monitoring plan has been designed to identify impacts to water <br />resources early should they occur. If monitoring shows a water related impact <br />CWI will implement a water replacement/mitigation p1 an, <br />CWI proposes to replace the water supply of arty legitimate water user impacted <br />by the mine until such time as repairs are instituted. The application <br />included specific sources of water owned by CWI that will be called upon. A <br />subsidence repair plan for springs, ponds, streams, and other resources is <br />included in Subsidence Volume 3. These repair plans will be modified and <br />refined depending on future experience with subsidence. The first five year <br />mine plan area is located in areas that do not contain many significant water <br />resources. This will allow CWI to obtain subsidence and repair experience <br />prior to mining sensitive areas. <br />The State Engineer's office was consulted during the course of the application <br />review. However, no approval of the mitigation plan could be granted by the <br />SEO since the SEO is not authorized by law to approve augmentation plans. <br />The Division finds the applicant in compliance with the requirements of this <br />section. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.