My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31361
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31361
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:33 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:59:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984067
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/3/1985
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The colluvium is at a higher elevation than the mine (using a 21o angle of <br />draw for subsidence related fracturing), therefore, no fracturing should <br />intercept slumps in the Gulch. Colluvium in the first ephemeral drainage <br />above the proposed portal could be dewatered due to subsidence fracturing, <br />however, since this system is very limited in extent, effects would be minimal. <br />The major effect from mining will be portal discharges due to subsidence after <br />abandonment. This effect is already occurring in the permit area. The <br />applicant observed discharge from the Victory No. 1 portal during the summer <br />of 1984 indicating limited but sustained flow from an underground source. The <br />maximum observed flow has been 25 gal/min during the spring months. This flow <br />drops during the summer. <br />The cause of this flow is thought to be subsidence intercepting the Cliff <br />House Sandstone aquifer. The total effect of locally dewatering portions of <br />the Cliff House Sandstone and colluvial slumps in the ephemeral tributary to <br />Coal Gulch are probably negligab]e. The Cliff House down Qradient from the <br />mine is not used as a source of water, and no springs issuing from it have <br />been identified. The colluvial slumps in the ephemeral drainage contribute <br />"base flow" to the drainage, but the entire drainage is a relatively minor <br />tributary to Coal Gulch. <br />Seeps issuing from the Menefee coals at coal/sandstone-shale contacts were <br />observed during the spring of 1985. These seeps were evident along <br />Highway 160 in the Coal Gulch area and along the highwall of the proposed mine <br />site. <br />Mining will encounter some water in the coal, though this water is seasonally <br />variable in amount. The amount of water which will be encountered in the coal <br />will be minimal, and could be used in normal mine operations. <br />The lenticular and highly discontinuous nature of the sandstones and shales of <br />the Menefee Formation, have led to the development of perched aquifer <br />systems. Mine operations should not physically intercept these perched <br />systems. Associated mechanical reaction to mining (floor heave, slabbing, or <br />roof falls) may induce inflows from some of these perched aquifers. The <br />existence of perched aquifers in the Mesaverde Group has been documented in <br />the North Fork of the Gunnison River Valley. Usually, those perched aquifers <br />are dewatered within 24 to 36 hours. <br />It is quite possible that mine operations at Coal Gulch will intercept some <br />perched aquifers during the life of the mine, or cause some perched aquifers <br />to dewater into the mine. The overall impacts of dewatering these isolated <br />pockets will be insignificant, so long as the water is properly stored and <br />treated before being discharged into undisturbed Coal Gulch. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.