My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31233
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31233
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:34 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:57:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/10/1986
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN1
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The applicant's discussion of probable hydrologic consequences <br />identified no anticipated changes in surface water quality. All <br />runoff from disturbed surface areas, including runoff from the <br />waste disposal site, drains through an approved sediment control <br />system. All discharges are made under the conditions of the <br />applicant's NPDES permit, and any effluent must meet the water <br />quality standards for the receiving streams. If necessary, <br />discharges are treated to assure compliance with water quality <br />standards. As a result, no degradation in the quality of surface <br />waters supplied to the alluvial valley floor is anticipated. <br />Any ground water supplied from strata with the potential to be <br />affected by the proposed operations is minimal. No major aquifers <br />have been identified in either the coal seam or the overburden. <br />Springs in the area are associated with lenticular sands, local <br />faulting and fracturing, and landslides. Most of the springs in or <br />adjacent to the five year permit area are located along Sylvester <br />Gulch (see Exhibit 2.6.2.A). Since part of this watershed would be <br />subject to subsidence, some of these springs could dry up. <br />However, these springs, which supply less than 50% of the flow in <br />Sylvester Gulch, are currently used as a water source for the Tony <br />Bear Pipeline which is now owned by WECC. Loss of this water would <br />not significantly decrease the water supply to the alluvial valley <br />floor. <br />No significant degradation in ground water quality is anticipated. <br />Following mining, new springs, fed by water supplied by the <br />accumulation of water in the underground workings, could form. At <br />present, the water quality of these springs under worst case <br />assumptions would approximate the water quality of flooded mine <br />workings at the Oliver Mine adit where total dissolved solids <br />concentrations range between 1050 and 1900 mg/1 (see CHIS-Affects <br />to Surface Waters section). However, flow from these springs would <br />be such a minor contribution of the water supplied to the alluvial <br />valley floor, no degradation of water quality in the alluvia] <br />valley floor is predicted. <br />3. Surface coal mining and reclamation operations are conducted to <br />preserve, throughout the mining and reclamation process, the <br />essential hydrologic functions of alluvial valley floors not within <br />the affected area (Rule 4.24.2). <br />None of the mining activities are located within the alluvial <br />valley floor and the natural geologic and hydrologic <br />characteristics of the valley floor would not be disturbed. In <br />addition, mining operations are not expected to affect the quantity <br />and quality of surface and ground water that supply the alluvial <br />valley floor. <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.