Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTERFOUR <br />Environmental Consequences <br />project. Additionally, the removal of woodland or shrub communities along the pipeline ROW <br />would be considered long term for the 50-foot-wide corridor that would be maintained in an <br />herbaceous state for the life of the project. The success or failure of revegetation would affect <br />other resources including soils, surface water, wildlife, visual resources and live:.tock grazing. <br />The relative significance of impacts to different vegetation communities depend<. on their social <br />and ecological sensitivity and importance: <br />Pinyon juniper woodlands in the study azeas provide severe winter range habitat for big <br />game, especially mule deer. Depending on the level of disturbance, it would take about 30 to <br />50 years before trees in revegetated azeas would be mature enough to provide adequate <br />thermal cover for big game. It would take up to 150 yeazs to replace a mature woodland and <br />up to 300 yeazs to re[um to the potential natural community. <br />Sagebrush, greasewood, and mountain shrub communities are generally considered less <br />sensitive to disturbance because of their shorter recovery time, usually 5 to 10 years, with a <br />return to the potential natural community in about 20 years. However, impacts to these <br />communities in severe winter range could adversely affect big game forage acid cover habitat <br />for the short- to mid-term and reduce the carrying capacity of critical habitat during the <br />period required to re-establish vegetation. <br />• Riparian and wetland areas are considered sensitive because of their importance for wildlife <br />habitat, biotic diversity, and their role in water quality protection. Wetlands are discussed in <br />more detail in Section 4.9. <br />• The loss or disturbance of the small ponderosa pine RVA would be considered significant <br />because this is an uncommon community in the Piceance Basin, and it would be difficult, if <br />not impossible, to re-establish this community or to mitigate impacts. <br />• The loss or disturbance of identified vulnerable or imperiled plant communities along the <br />proposed pipeline corridor would be considered a significant impact. <br />• Invasion of noxious weeds that impairs vegetation efforts or affects lands outside the Project <br />Area would be a significant impact. <br />• Failure to revegetate large areas would be a significant impact. <br />A Soil Conservation, Erosion and Sediment Control, Reclamation, and Revegetatr'on Plan (The <br />Plan) prepared for the Yankee Gulch Project describes measures American Soda would take to <br />minimize impacts associated with project development and procedures to reclaim areas of <br />disturbance (Water and Earth Technologies, Inc. and Habitat Management, Inc. 1598). Measures <br />specific to vegetation and reclamation include the following. <br />• Design mining operations and construct facilities to minimize disturbance and retain low- <br />growing herbaceous vegetation over more than 50 percent of the mining panels and the <br />product pipeline ROW. <br />• Implement standard erosion control measures, as needed. <br />Carry out interim revegetation with a BLM-approved seed mixture on areas not needed for <br />subsequent development. <br />4-38 Vegetation <br />