My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31173
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31173
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:32 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:56:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1984014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/22/2005
Doc Name
splp results review cotter corporation
From
russ means
To
harry posey
Permit Index Doc Type
DMO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~r"l, hh~, hbh, Cam, SSS <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 21 s - C O L O 1tAD O <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 DIVISION O F <br />Phone: (303) 8663567 r/~ MINERAL S <br />FAX: (303) 8328106 v ~' ~~ ~ S G E O L O G Y <br />0.ECLANATION•NINING <br />SA FE TY•SQENCE <br />Bill Owens <br />Date: July 22, 2005 ''r covemor <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br />To: Russ Means Ronald w, Cattany <br />/ Division Director <br />From: V IIa1Ty POSe Natural Resource Trustre <br />/ / ~~' <br />Re: SPLP results review: Cotter Corpora ' n, JD-6 (M-1977-319), JD- 8 (1984-014) and JD-9 <br />(M-1977,306) Mines <br />Background: This memo assesses the results of SPLP tests on waste rock samples that aze purported by <br />Cotter to be representative of the above captioned operations. The results were presented in Cotter's letter <br />received by the Division on June 28, 2005. Provided these samples aze truly representative, then as DMG <br />staff and Cotter agreed, the tests results may be applied to waste rock at the JD-6, JD-8 and JD-9 as the <br />company has represented that the mines are geographically close and mining will occur within the same <br />geological formations. We understand that SPLP test results for ore samples will be forthcoming. The <br />following discussion and Table 1 provides guidelines for the company to consider in evaluating to what <br />extent any release of contaminants from these facilities might affect water quality. If higher SPLP results <br />appear from the ore samples, Cotter should consider those separately. <br />SPLP Results for JD Mines: The following SPLP results from waste rock exceed certain applicable <br />water quality pazameters. <br />Table 1. Comparison of SPLP results with ground or surface water standards. <br />Anal~te SPLP Results Standazd Comments & dilution required to meet standard <br /> (u (ug/L) <br /> Waste Ore <br /> Rock <br />Aluminum 480 None 87 Chronic aquatic life standazd. <br /> available 6x dilution needed. <br />Lead 23 None 0.5 Chronic aquatic life standard @ hazdness of 25. <br /> available 46x dilution needed. <br />Selenium 61 None 4.6 Chronic aquatic life standard. <br /> available Agricultural Standazd = 20 ug/L for 30 day period. <br /> 14x dilution needed for surface water. <br />Arsenic 210 None 50 Drinking water standard <br /> available Sx dilution needed. <br />OFFce of Office of Colorado <br />Mined Land RE.clarnation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.