GENERAL31136 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

METHODS In eazly June 1998, four reference sites were established within reclaimed azeas at Coal Basin Mine that had become infested with noxious weeds. The reference sites were located within lazger infested azeas that would be subject to weed control efforts over a several yeaz period. Size of the reference sites vazied, but each was rectangular in shape, and mazked in the field by wooden or steel stakes at each comer. A systematic sampling design was employed for data collection within each reference area. Repeated sampling of the same azeas over the course of the control project was intended to provide an objective basis for evaluating treatment success; recognizing that, because multiple replications of treatments and controls were not employed, population trends could not be definitively linked to specific management variables. Reference site locations, slope and aspect, and initial infestation severity, were chosen to be generally representative of the larger treatment areas within which the reference azeas were located. Statistical inference based on data from individual reference azeas cannot be extended to the larger treatment azeas. However, the reference area data can be combined with visual evaluation of reference and larger treatment areas to ensure a more objective assessment of treatment impacts, and to provide a sound basis for professional judgement and management decisions. Sampling was conducted the 3d or 4t6 weak of June each yeaz. Reference Area #1 ("Sutey Pile Flat") is a SOm x 35m area on relatively flat topography located immediately to the west of the Sutey Refuse Pile, within the "V" formed by a ranch road and a refuse pile access road that diverge at that location. Each year of the study, ten, 35m cover transects were run, with Sm spacing between transects. Two cover readings were made at 1.5 intervals along each transect, using a tripod mounted oculaz point bar, giving a total of 4b cover points per transect. Live vegetation (current year's growth for herbaceous vegetation) was recorded by species, along with litter, rock, and baze ground. In 1998, density of combined thistle species wasestimated by counting live thistle plants within a Im by 35m quadrat along one side of each transect. In subsequent yeazs, houndstongue density was also estimated. Reference Area #2 ("West Slope Sutey") is a SOm x 25m area on the steep west facing slope of the Sutey Pile, near the southwest cornet of the pile. Ten, 25m covet transects were run each year, with Sm spacing between transects. Two cover readings were made at lm intervals alongthe transect, for a total of 50 cover points per transect. Each year, density of combined thistle species andhoundstongue was estimated for the south half of the reference area, by counting individual plants within 1xZ5mquadrats along one side of each of the five transects within the south half of the reference azea. Reference Area #3 ("Belt-line Flat") is located along the relatively flat surface of a segment ofbeltline corridor, which was reseeded in the fall of 1997. The reference area is SOm x lOm, with ten, lOm transects spaced at Sm intervals. Two cover readings were made at O.Sm intervals, for a total of 40 cover readings per transect. Thistle density was estimated by counting thistle plants within 1x10mquadrats along one side of each transect. Reference Area #4 ("Belt-line Outslope") is not actually a reference area, but rather two pazallel50m transects along the weed infested outslope of the beltline corridor, adjacent to Reference Area #3. One cover reading per one meter interval was recorded, for a total of 50 points per transect. Cover readings for each transect were made on the uphill side ofthe transect. Due to very high initial density of noxious weeds, density counts were not attempted. Transects were staked at each end to ensure that the same transect locations were read each yeaz.