My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31095
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31095
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:28 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:52:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/30/2002
Doc Name
2002 Annual Report Methane Assessment
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1.0 Previous Investigation and Si[e <br />1.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION AND SITE HISTORY <br />The methane seepage problem was first reported in late 1998. Discovery of methane seepage was <br />via the apparent loss of vegetation on the site. <br />' 1.1 METHANE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES <br />This report presents the results of monitoring from 2002 and cumulative results of the 3-year <br />monitoring period. This report amends the previous methane surveys conducted near the former <br />Golden Eagle Mine located near Weston in Las Animas County, Colorado (Figure I). As part of <br />' previous investigations at the site, 25 monitoring points (B 1 through B25) were installed on site to <br />evaluate the extent and concentrations of methane in the shallow subsurface soils (Figure 2). Most <br />of these sites are located within the zone of impact. Several of the sites are located near two <br />abandoned coal bed methane wells located south of the area of visual impacts. These sites have <br />been monitored over time using a Landtec GA-90 methane gas detector. Concentrations have been <br />' measured approximately every 2 months since these points were installed in March 1999, until the <br />beginning of the year 2000. During the years 2000 to 2002, the monitoring frequency was adjusted <br />to a quarterly schedule. <br />' Concentrations of methane within the monitoring points have ranged from below detection limits <br />to 100 percent (the Landtec GA -90 methane gas detector has an accuracy of +/- 10 percent). <br />' Table 1 summarizes the measurements from all investigations. Examination of the data in Table 1 <br />indicates that concentrations of methane in the monitoring points exhibit a decreasing trend over <br />time. These data do not account for changes in weather conditions that may influence the liberation <br />of methane. Higher atmospheric pressure may result in lower methane liberation, and vice-versa. <br />Ten additional monitoring points were installed in June 2000 and monitored as the previous 25 <br />points. These points were installed in and outside of areas with stressed vegetation to attempt to <br />monitor and delineate impacts. A surface survey was also conducted at the site during July 2001. <br />' The surface survey consisted of monitoring of the ground surface at the site using a flame <br />ionization detector (FID). <br />' When the gas wells at the site were plugged and abandoned, four of the methane monitoring points <br />that were installed as part of the investigation were destroyed. These points are B18, B19, B27, <br />and B28. In addition, two monitoring points (B20 and B21) appear to have been moved. <br />During the previous investigation, four additional monitoring points (AMl throughAM4) were <br />installed. These points were installed with selected intervals of the subsurface screened for the <br />detection of methane. These additional monitoring points were monitored in June and August <br />2001. <br />Meth{292)-I1-02.doc, 11/20/2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.