My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31089
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:28 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:52:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/10/1997
Doc Name
COAL MINE WASTE BANK DESIGN FOR THE SANBORN CREEK MINE PN C-81-022
From
DMG
To
BILL CARTER
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Bill Carter <br />Sanborn Creek - New Pile Preliminary Review <br />page 2 <br />regarding the possible depth of colluvial/alluvial material in the erosional <br />trough beneath the proposed location of the sediment pond. The sediment <br />pond and its concrete wall dam are proposed to occupy a relatively narrow <br />erosional trough cut through the massive Rollins Sandstone outcrop. The <br />Rollins at this location is massive and competent. The applicant proposes <br />to key the concrete wall into the sandstone at each abutment. I have no <br />doubt that this will effectively assist in preventing overturning of the <br />wall under hydrostatic head. My concern relates to the applicant's lack of <br />a determination of the actual depth and character of the colluvial fill <br />occupying the erosional pocket immediately beneath the proposed pond <br />location. <br />During our walking tour of the site last fall, we specifically discussed <br />this concern with the applicant and WESTEC's representatives. The <br />prospective contractor indicated a possibility of being able to access the <br />site with a backhoe from the adjoining railroad right-of-way. OXBOW <br />intended to request permission from the railroad. However, the only <br />subsurface investigation reported within the design analysis is an auger <br />boring in the west yard, several hundred feet from the pond site. My <br />concern relates to the possibility of hydraulic effects which might result <br />from uncontrolled flow beneath the concrete wall. <br />I do not consider this to be a critical flaw in the application. In order to <br />satisfy my concern, it will be necessary for OXBOW to verify the depth to <br />the Rollins Sandstone bedrock beneath the concrete pond wall prior to its <br />installation. If possible, I believe the concrete wall should be founded <br />directly upon the competent sandstone. This would require excavation to <br />the bedrock and the preparation of a keyway trench. f would not be <br />surprised, however, if competent bedrock was several tens of feet beneath <br />the current depositional surface. The high energy environment of these <br />ledge sandstone outcrop valleys can result in the development of <br />surprisingly deep, narrow notches. The location of the railroad <br />embankment immediately downslope may have impounded considerable <br />colluvium during the past several decades. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.