My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30918
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:20 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:49:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/14/2003
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance For RN4
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Disturbance of the alluvial material is not expected to significantly reduce the quantity <br />of water present in the alluvial material underlying the facilities azea. Some <br />degradation of the quality of water in the alluvial material is evident based on field <br />conductivity and laboratory analyses of water samples taken from two on-site alluvial <br />groundwater monitoring wells (wells AAl and AA3). Over time, the concentration of <br />total dissolved solids has increased significantly in downgradient monitoring well <br />AA1. Water samples obtained from well AA1, from 1987 through 1992, show <br />elevated levels of certain constituents including boron, calcium, chloride, fluoride, <br />magnesium, nitrate, potassium, sodium, and sulfate compared to water samples <br />analyzed from well AA 1 prior to 1986 and compared to water samples analyzed from <br />well AA3 which is upstream of the facilities area. There are two likely sources for the <br />contamination of alluvial well AA1. The first possible source of this contamination is <br />the coal stockpile, which was formerly located upgradient of well AAl. The second <br />possible source is the spring that is located near the pre-law Edwards Mine portal. <br />Adequate dilution of any effluent generated at the Bear No. 3 Mine will mitigate any <br />effects of reduced water quality in the Bear No. 3 alluvium on downstream AVFs. The <br />Beater the distance from the Bear No. 3 Mine, the greater the dilution of any effluent. <br />The potential impacts are considered insignificant, and the applicant's groundwater and <br />surface monitoring program should detect any changes in the quantity and quality of <br />ground and surface water supplied to the North Fork of the Gunnison River and, <br />therefore, to alluvial valley floors downstream. <br />No potentially significant impacts to the AVF have been identified. The monitoring <br />plan outlined in the permit application will ensure that the essential hydrologic <br />functions of the AVF aze maintained by monitoring the development of any effluent at <br />the Bear No. 3 Mine site. <br />XVIII. Operations on Prime Farmland <br />Prime farmland investigation information is located in Section 2.04.12 and 4.25 of the Beaz <br />No. 3 permit application. <br />No prime farmland exists within the permit area. The majority of the disturbed area has <br />been historically affected by mining and has not been historically used as cropland. The <br />Soil Conservation Service has indicated that no soils have been identified as prime farmland <br />in Gunnison County, Colorado (SCS, USDA, 1980, Important Farmland Inventory - <br />Colorado, Denver, Colorado). <br />The Bear Coal operation is in compliance with the provisions ofthis section. <br />XIX. Mountaintop Removal <br />This section does not apply to the Bear Coal Company permit. <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.