Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The valley associated with Pyeatt Gulch contains unconsolidated streamlaid <br />deposits. All of these alluvial materials are located downstream of the <br />proposed permit area and will, therefore, not be physically disturbed by <br />mining. Land use along Pyeatt Gulch consists of cropland and undeveloped <br />rangeland (see Map 35-B). Unirrigated wheat and native grass hay are grown <br />along Pyeatt Gulch and constitute 719 acres of cropland. The average annual <br />water yield for Pyeatt Gulch is 154 acre-feet. The applicant, through <br />interviews with local Soil Conservation Service officials, has determined that <br />this is an insufficient amount of water to economically practice flood <br />irrigation. Flood irrigation is occasionally practiced in the Pyeatt Gulch <br />valley. The McNamera Oitch (see Map M31) is fed water from a deep bedrock <br />well. The ditch irrigates about 150 acres of crested wheat grass. Crop <br />yields range from one to one-third tons/acre. The well is completed in <br />bedrock to a depth of in excess of 400 feet. Since the ditch is not fed by <br />surface water or alluvial ground water, Pyeatt Gulch does not constitute an <br />AVF based upon the existing flood irrigation. Data supplied by the applicant <br />indicate that the depth to the alluvial water table is from 5.6 feet to 7.7 <br />feet. This water table is too deep for wheat and native grasses to be <br />subirrigated. Therefore, based on the lack of sufficient water available in <br />the drainage for agricultural benefit, Pyeatt Gulch is determined not to be an <br />alluvial valley floor. <br />The applicant has identified unconsolidated streamlaid deposits along the <br />valley of Flume Gulch. All of these alluvial materials are located downstream <br />of the proposed mining at the Trapper Mine. In fact, within this 5-year <br />permit term, mining will not encroach upon any portion of the Flume Gulch <br />drainage area. Land use along Flume Gulch consists of undeveloped rangeland <br />and cropland. None of these crops are currently or were historically flood <br />irrigated. Original data submitted by the applicant indicated that depths to <br />the alluvial water table are shallow enough (about 2 feet) for the alfalfa to <br />be subirrigated. More recent data shows the depths to ground water to he much <br />greater (at least 6 feet). Based on the original data the Division determined <br />that Flume Gulch is an alluvial valley floor. At this time sufficient data <br />has not been submitted by the operator to refute this finding. Therefore, <br />Flume Gulch is still determined to be an alluvial valley floor, The <br />boundaries of the AVF are shown on Map M35A of the permit application. No <br />portions of the AYF are proposed to be physically disturbed by mining in this <br />5-year permit renewal term. Potential impacts to the Flume (;inch AVF are <br />discussed later in this document. Prior to mining in the Flume Gulch drainage <br />or in the vicinity of the drainage during future permit terms, all issues <br />relating to this AVF must be resolved. <br />The Yampa River valley meets the requirements to be classified as an AVF, <br />That is, it contains unconsolidated streamlaid deposits and sufficient amounts <br />of water to be utilized for agricultural activities. Land use along the Yampa <br />River valley consists primarily of irrigated hayland and pastureland. <br />Cropland is both flood irrigated and subirrigated. It is unlikely that the <br />Trapper Mine will impact the Yampa River AVF. This is further discussed later <br />in this document. <br />The Williams Fork River valley also meets the requirements to be classified as <br />an AVF. There are agricultural activities including flood irrigation <br />-18- <br />