My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30772
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30772
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:14 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:48:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/13/2002
Doc Name
County Special Use Permit Application - 9/200
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BME has monitored Red Wash during active subsidence. The schedule for monitoring Red Wash was <br />tied to monitoring nine alluvial wells established in Red Wash. When the longwall face advanced to <br />within 200 feet of the Red Wash alluvium, tension cracks that might appear on the surface were <br />searched for on a schedule of once every two weeks. This schedule continued until the longwall face <br />advanced past the alluvium 400 feet. After the longwall advanced more than 400 feet past the Red <br />Wash alluvium, surface crack monitoring resumed at a schedule of once every two months to coincide <br />with monitoring of the nine alluvial wells. No interruption in the flow of water to the White River <br />occurred. <br />Scullion Gulch will be visually monitored several times a week unit retreat has proceeded a distance <br />from the channel equal to at least the depth of the seam. <br />There will be no mining beneath any known aquifer that serves as a significant source of water supply <br />to any public water systems and there will be no mining beneath any public buildings, residential <br />structures, urbanized areas or towns. <br />I.A.6.g Subsidence Effects on the Powerline. A need to re-orient the mine plan impacted the <br />initially proposed non-subsidence corridor. Either considerable longwall tonnage would be eliminated <br />or the concept of anon-subsidence corridor had to be abandoned. To ensure that maximum economic <br />recovery of the coal is achieved, BME chose the latter alternative. <br />As discussed elsewhere, the waterline will be protected from subsidence either by relocating <br />underground or constructing an offset line to bypass any affected portion of the waterline. However, <br />relocation of the 138-Kv powerline was not economically feasible and portions of the powerline were <br />allowed to subside with mitigative measures in place. In actuality no effect of subsidence was noted <br />on the waterline during the mining of LW-1 to LW-5. <br />An analysis of subsidence effects on the 138-kV powerline indicated that some of the pole structures <br />would be affected by the subsidence. The worst possible consequences of subsidence to the power <br />line would be the interruption of power supply to the mine. The consequencesof such a power failure <br />would be the same as those experienced in past power failures -the mine would be evacuated of all <br />personnel until the power supply is reestablished and all safety procedures determine that the mine is <br />safe to reenter. <br />There are a total of 28 structureswithin the permit boundary on the 138-kV powerline. Of this total, 11 <br />structures are in positions where they may be affected by subsidence. The structures are bolted <br />wooden two-pole structures with connecting crossbraces. BME owns the structures and lines and is <br />the only customer served by the powerline. <br />Rio Blanco County Special Use Permit #81-1 <br />Exhibit B -Mining Plan <br />September2000 <br />'12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.