Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Date: February 14, 2000 <br />To: Rich Muza, EPA Hydrologist <br />From: James Dillie, DMG Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Re: Suggested Revisions of your Clarification Letter, San Luis Project <br />I am including comments from Hany Posey, DMG Environmental Protection Specialist. <br />Questions and Answers; Response to question 1, sentence 3: Mr. Posey suggests including if <br />resent after "possible contaminants". <br />Questions and Answers; Response to question 1: Mr. Posey suggests including a sentence at the <br />end of the pazagraph that says; This analvsis does not sav or imply that such contaminants exist. <br />Questions and Answers; Response to question 2, pazagraph 3, sentence 2 you maxi want to <br />include "to the receptor" even though a contaminant source has not been observed in the Santa <br />Fe aquifer. <br />Questions and Answers; Response to question 2, pazagraph 4: Mr. Posey suggest: including a <br />sentence at the end of the pazagraph that says; Again, the analysis does not sav or imply that such <br />contaminants exist. <br />Questions and Answers; Response to question 3, sentence 1: it is suggested to include <br />"contaminants", if present, "aze'". <br />Questions and Answers; Response to question 4, sentence 1: at the end of element number 2 you <br />may want to include ie, within 5 miles. <br />Questions and Answers; Response to question 6: you can include; junk yazds, trash transfer <br />station, old gravel pit used as a landfill and fertilization of crops. <br />Questions and Answers; Response to question 7: Mr. Posey suggests including a sentence at the <br />end of the pazagraph which says; Based on extensive eroundwater and surface water monitorine <br />azound the former pit area there is evidence for migration of some contaminants outside the pit <br />azea but arsenic has not been detected outside the pit. <br />