Laserfiche WebLink
and consists of vegetation sampling data, valley floor cross-sections, and a transect location <br />maps. The applicant also refers to the narrow and deeply incised nature of Middle Creek. <br />There is no indication of past or current flood irrigation of these areas along Middle Creek and <br />the geomorphic chazacteristics of this azea would not lend themselves to the development of <br />an irrigation system. Based on the lack of flood irrigation potential, the narrow and incised <br />nature of the valley bottom, and the lack of meaningful differences between the creekside and <br />upland vegetative communities, the Division has determined that areas upstream of the Connel <br />ditch lateral crossing of Middle Creek, as shown on Map 15, are not alluvial valley floors. In <br />this case, the extent of farmable acreage would be 10 acres or less. The azeas are not presently <br />and have not historically been farmed and evidence presented indicates that farming is not <br />typically practiced on similaz pazcels in the region. A previous negative determination had <br />already been made for those lands along Middle Creek downstream from the County Road No. <br />33 in section 12 to the first irrigation ditch crossing (Connel ditch lateral). <br />Effects of Mining on Identified Alluvial Valley Floors <br />Due to elevated levels of salinity documented in current and future mine discharge water, and <br />to potential inhibitory effects of increased soil and alluvial ground water salinity on flood- <br />irrigated and subirrigated crops, the potential for material damage caused by salt loading was a <br />major concern which had to be evaluated for each of the AVFs identified above. <br />Material damage was projected for sub-irrigation and for flood irrigation, using data obtained <br />during low-flow-of-record years. The sub-irrigation scenario assumed streamflow would <br />recharge alluvium during high springtime flows. The flood irrigation case utilized the period <br />between June 1 and August 31. Assumptions and equations used in projecting water quality <br />impacts are discussed in the Yampa River CHIA, which is on file at the Division office. Salt <br />loading projections were arrived at by stream flow modeling and analysis of past monitoring <br />results and projected dewatering activities. <br />In the supplemental information package dated September 22, 1986, the applicant submitted <br />information on vegetation cover and production by species for flood irrigated and sub-irrigated <br />croplands on the affected alluvial valley floors. Alluvial bodies, irrigated fields and vegetation <br />sample locations aze depicted on supplemental Map No. 1 "Twentymile Pazk Salt Loading <br />Study Land Use and Hydrologic -Boundaries." This and other information was used by the <br />Division to make the required findings with regazd to material damage. <br />Required findings for identified alluvial valley floors on Fish Creek, Trout Creek, and Foidel <br />Creek/Middle Creek confluence aze presented sepazately below. <br />Fish Creek <br />1. The proposed mining operations will not interrupt, discontinue, or preclude farming of the <br />alluvial floor. <br />31 <br />