Laserfiche WebLink
oii oiooiooiooooooio <br />C~~~~ ~~wocc~o Q~® Q~§®~i~,v~~ <br />November 30, 1993 <br />y - ~ ~ 1645 Court Place <br />DEC 03 1993 s°~~' <br />Denver, Colorado 60202 <br />Phone/FAX (3031629-9335 <br />Wa 1 1 y Erickson Di:~l~ic~ c' :~..~ru..s a uec!ogy <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street 2nd Floor <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br />Re: Closure work <br />at Trinidad Basin Mine <br />Dear Wally: <br />I delivered the mylar for the TBM site to your office while you <br />were out yesterday. It should be helpful to you in the landowner <br />notification of the final reclamation items. <br />I have received the letter dated November 15, 1993 to Gary Hanisch <br />from Dan Hernandez. I disagree with the need to conduct slope <br />stability analyses on the impoundments leading to Pond 22-P4. The <br />reasons for this belief are stated below: <br />1) The three impoundments are actually old sediment ponds 22-P5, <br />22-P6 and 22-P10. These ponds have approved P.E. designs in the <br />permit located in the submittal of August 26, 1980 by Mineral <br />resource and Engineering, Inc. The maps showing the approved <br />designs are 8009-54, 8009-SS and 8009-S8. <br />2) These ponds have been in place since 1980 and have performed <br />admirably with no maintenance whatsoever. <br />3) As a professional engineer involved with the site for many <br />years, I can tell you that these embankments are free of cracking, <br />bulging, seepage, slipping or any other signs of instability. I <br />would be willing to sign documents as a P.E. that they are stable <br />for permanent retention. The embankments themselves were actually <br />the haul road for the trucks leaving the strip area. They were <br />constructed with extremely heavy equipment and good compaction was <br />achieved. <br />4) The landowner is likely to sign a waiver absolving anyone of <br />future repercussions, should a problem with the ponds develop. <br />This alone should warrant the slope stability analyses unnecessary. <br />5) There is no significant threat to life or property downstream if <br />the ponds should fail. <br />6) 6Vhen all ponds on the west side of the property were designated <br />to remain, no slope stability analyses were conducted. It is true <br />that some steeper slopes exist on the outslopes of these <br />embankments but they are no less stable. As stated above, these <br />road embankments were built exceptionally well. <br />