My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30618
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:07 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:45:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/18/1985
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR PR
From
Mines No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-33- <br />Use of these stations allows determination of approximate inflows to the North <br />Fork of the Gunnison River contributed by the study watershed boundary located <br />on Figure 1. The average monthly flows are illustrated on Table 2, along with <br />the inflows to the North Fork of the Gunnison River from Minnesota Creek. <br />These figures were used to determine the amount of outflow via the North Fork <br />of the Gunnison River from the basin. Obviously, such predictions are not <br />absolutely accurate. For example, less than 3 years of data existed for <br />Minnesota Creek and 1 year (1977) experienced drought conditions. However, <br />for purposes of this assessment, such figures provide a rough approximation of <br />flows through the general area. <br />PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES <br />Effects of the Bear Coal Company Mining Operation on Ground Water <br />Faults and fractures intercepted during the Bear Mining operation could <br />produce mine inflows as is the case in other mines in the North Fork Basin. <br />Any inflows which may occur are expected to be minor, based on mining,of the <br />C Seam in the Bear No. 1 and No. 2 and previous mining of the C Seam in the <br />old Edwards mine, which has resulted in minor inflows. As of 1985, the Bear <br />No. 3 Mine has not reported any inflows. Apparently, the massive sandstone <br />which caps the lower coal member produces very little water. These mines have <br />not discharged mine water, but have imported water into the mines for <br />underground use. <br />There is a possibility that water existing in the Rollins Sandstone or other <br />sandstones below the C Seam could appear as mine inflows from the floor, <br />through faults or fractures penetrating the lower strata, or produce floor <br />heaving. Floor seeps have not been encountered in any of the three Bear <br />mines. Floor seeps have occurred in other mines in the area. Mine inflows of <br />10 gpm have been reported, associated with the D Seam floor at the Orchard <br />Valley mine, near Paonia. The only other bedrock aquifers in the general <br />area, above the Bear mines, are the saturated lenticular sandstones in the <br />Barren member above the F Seam. The C Seam is separated from the Barren <br />member by over 300 feet of sedimentary strata. No impact on the hydrologic <br />functions of the Barren member aquifers, including springs supplied by those <br />aquifers is anticipated. <br />Effects of mining on the alluvial aquifer of the North Fork of the Gunnison <br />are expected to be insignificant, and are discussed in the Alluvial Ualley <br />Floor Section (VII) of this document. Disturbance to the alluvium is limited <br />to construction and operation of surface facilities and coal storage. No <br />underground development waste will be stored on the surface. No coal <br />processing waste will be produced. A portion of the water used in the <br />Bear No. 3 mining operation comes from the alluvium of the North Fork. This <br />causes only a localized draw down in the alluvial water table, since the <br />alluvium has a high transmissivity, and the well is located in close proximity <br />to the river. Thus, the Bear operation will have little if any impact on <br />alluvial ground water use in the area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.