Laserfiche WebLink
Enclosed is some of the vvat aliry• data taken from Trimble Lane an ers Bridge. T.ie shaded <br />numbers show dissolved and oral zinc concentrations on days when conc~ftrations were hi;rher at Trimble <br />Lane than at Bakers Bridge. Zinc is the main metal of concern because the dissolved concentrations are <br />frequently at levels tonic to sensitive aquatic life. (Hardness tends to be low in this stretch ~>f river.) While <br />not conclusive, this data demonstrates the need for more investigation. <br />River Channel Effects. Enclosed are aerial photographs from October 1994 of the three largest operations <br />on the river, Ivtountain Redi Nfix, Burnett's Bar-D pit, and Sandco. The destruction of the river channel is <br />obvious. Mining operations have confined and braided the river channel. The floodway ha:. been narrowed <br />so that floodwaters are less likely to spread out and dissipate their energy. (The floodway waz re- <br />designated by a study a couple of years ago.) This may increase the likelihood of erosion artd flood damage <br />downstream <br />In addition, the shifting of the river bed and the driving of heavy equipment has destroyed riparian areas. <br />Some of these zones may provide habitat for an endangered species, the Southwestern vvillo~•v flycatcher. <br />We suspect that mining has lowered the river bottom as much as eleven feet under the Trimble Lane <br />Bridge. Correspondingly, the water table near the river has fallen. Nearly agricultural area:> and river <br />banks are no longer sub-irrigated. Riparian vegetation such az willows can no longer grow ;utd stabilize <br />river banles because the tops of the vertical banks are too high above low flow water levels. Their roots do <br />not receive enough water. The falling water table may have also dried up riparian wetlands. <br />Along with environmental impacts, the mining operations have affected other property o~vrers. Water-right <br />holders on the Wallace Ditch can no longer divert water because of shifts in the river bed. <br />in stimmary~, vice do not understand the ramifications of gravel mining on such a large scale ur the Animas <br />River. It is irresponsible to continue to issue permits without analyzing and quantifying the .impacts of <br />these operations. The Corps should ar a minimum hold public hearings and conduct an environmental <br />assessment before re-issuing these peanits. <br />