My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30527
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:03 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:44:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976020
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/14/1996
Doc Name
MEMO-MEETING WITH GEOF SCHLITTGEN AND RICH MAYO ON 8-13-96
From
DMG
To
FILE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F:ICS l9 .. ~ O ~ ~ _.. lSl I P'. ail <br />O <br />.~a ~cde <br />• <br /> <br />A•!r. John N. Reese <br />District Engineer <br />US Corps of Engineers <br />1325 J Street <br />Sacramento, CA 95S14-2922 <br />Re: Public Notice r* 199475200 <br />Dear Dfr. P.eese: <br />Ai;G 1 3 i~~ <br /> <br />pENVER <br />OFFICE <br />Please consider my concerns with respect to the above referenced Public Notice, <br />specifically as they apply to ;~(ountain Redi ~'lix and its application to renecc its <br />permit for excavation and the activities related to minim gravel from the Thomas <br />I'it located on the Animas River. <br />I own the SO acres immediately beloc~• the Mountain Redi A'Iix/Thomas I'It. \!y <br />property spans both sides of the river for approximate)}' 7200-1300 ft. I am <br />confounded that I only learned of this application from my next door neighbor there <br />in Durango on Alarch 2;. .Although I reside in Atlanta Ga. S months a year, all mail <br />is forwarded to me there, and I received no such notification. I a~ncur with another <br />neighbor, AIr. Schlittgen's asse~~ment, tlizt it i~ indeed irregular that those I-.eigl~bors <br />most impacted by this operation ~:'ould have been il,advertentl~,~ left off the <br />notification list. <br />In view of the limited time available to respond, my concerns include, but are not <br />limited to the following: <br />1. Noise polution and VISUaI pOlLltlOn - In light of the chan~in~ reaidentual <br />profile of that part of the valley and the pmpc,-t}• values slated thereto. <br />2. Loss of prime irrigation water from thc• i1'allace ditc}t, no~t~ }ugh and dry <br />due to the diversion of the east channel of the r~nlRlaS P.iver, attributable <br />to the gravel operation \'[5' O:at2r ClohtS inClUde .2~ cfc from that ditch. <br />[have IS to 20 acres that are not irrigable as a result. `,everal neighbors <br />have lost water from that ditch and these damages should be remedied <br />and similar potential impacts to others must be protected before they are <br />allo«•ed to continue. <br />3. Negative effects upon the water Iluality and the «ater table, ir. addiliun to <br />the possible exces,ive and irregular stream baak errosion caused by the Pit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.