Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Memo to Carl Mount <br />Seneca II-W Pre-Blasting Survey <br />page 3 <br />If Peabody conducts any blasting at Seneca II-W they could subject <br />themselves to receipt of a cease order for imninent harm. The <br />violation could be either administrative or performance standard in <br />nature, depending upon the circumstances. Finally, abatement could <br />include required revision of their blasting plan to demonstrate <br />compliance with Rule 4.08.4(9), which requires that blasting be <br />conducted to prevent, among other things, injury to persons, and <br />damage to public or private property outside the permit area. <br />cc: Sue Mowry <br />Mike Long <br />Doc. No: 5316E <br />JP/jP <br />