My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30336
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30336
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:47:54 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 10:11:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/13/2002
Doc Name
MINE PLAN DECISION LETTER TO NEPA COMPLIANCE DOC
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• No threatened or endangered species of plants exist at the McClane Canyon <br />site, based on information supplied by the applicant. <br />Fish and Wildlife <br />Colorado MLRD has consulted with Colorado Division of Wildlife personnel <br />who are familiar with the area. Both agencies agree that there is little <br />potential for adverse effects of the mine on wildlife since nearly all of <br />the anticipated surface disturbance has occurred and a very limited area <br />is affected. OSMRE has conditioned the mining plan approval to ensure <br />the applicant contributes to the Colorado River conservation fund for <br />endangered £ish species as mitigation of .the effects of depleting waters <br />from the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br />BackfillinR and Grading <br />Because the mine is an underground mine, only a limited area of surface <br />disturbance will require backfilling and grading. <br />All portals and the sediment pond will be backfilled. The coal seam will <br />be completely covered with backfilled material. Drainage will be <br />restored to approximate premining conditions. <br />If underground development waste is generated during mining it will be <br />retained in the mine workings. <br />Salt Creek Mining Company has proposed to partially backfill cut-slopes <br />at the mine portal bench. Natural slopes in the vicinity are very steep <br />and complete backfilling of the existing cut slopes would be difficult. <br />Colorado MLRD has conditioned the permit to ensure an adequate grading <br />plan and stability analysis. <br />Socioeconomics Assessment <br />The Salt Creek Mining Company employs 15 persons at the McClane Canyon <br />mine. Hourly operating personnel work at the minesite, approximately 20 <br />miles north of Loma, Colorado, on I-70 west of Grand Junction. According <br />to the company, the number of employees will not vary from the current <br />level during the projected 2-3 year life of this mining operation. <br />The Company reported that all past employees resided in the Fruita-Grand <br />Junction area. Only one did not live in the area before being employed. <br />Employees commute to work via car pool or private auto. <br />Since the minesite is actually in Garfield Co., that county will receive <br />the direct benefit of the increase in assessed valuation due to mine <br />property and equipment. Mesa County will benefit to a lesser degree from <br />purchases by mine employees, as well as residential property taxes. <br />Earlier projections of mine-induced revenues in the East-Central Colorado <br />Coal Environmental Statement, BLM, 1978. p. 796, were $4,000,000 for Mesa <br />County and considerably more for Garfield Co. However, these estimates <br />• were based on the expectation of a much larger operation getting underway <br />sooner with several hundred employees. During this phase of the McClane <br />Canyon mine, the public revenues generated by only 15 employees residing <br />in Mesa Co. would be relatively minor. <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.