Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COMPLIANCE ORDER AND ASSESSMENT OF C1VII. PENALTY <br />IN THE MATTER OF COSTILI.A COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />8. Duration Of The Violation. According to the County, the fire started on October <br />14 and was continuing on October 17, 1995. The Division will assess the penalty as a one day <br />violation. <br />$1500.00 x 1 day = $1500.00 <br />II. Circumstances to be considered as grounds for reducing or eliminating civil penalties <br />pursuant to Section 25-7-122, C.RS., as amended. <br />1. The Voluntary And Complete Disclosure By The Violator Oi Such Violation In <br />A Timely Fashion After Discovery OC The Noncompliance. The Division discovered the <br />violation so no penalty reduction is allowed. <br />($0000.00) <br />2. Full And Prompt Cooperation By The Violator Following Disclosure Of The <br />Violation Including, When Appropriate, Entering Into A I.sgally Enforceable Commitment <br />To Undertake Compliance And Remedial Efforts. No legally enforceable commitment has <br />been given, therefore no reduction in penalty is allowed. <br />($0000.00) <br />3. The Euctence And Scope Of A Regularized And Comprehensive Environmental <br />Compliance Program Or An Environmental Audit Program. The existence of a compliance <br />plan or audit program was not demonstrated by violator, therefore no reduction in penalty is allowed. <br />($0000.00) <br />4. Substantial Economic Impact Of A Penalty On The Violator. There has been <br />no evidence offered that this penalty amount would have a substantial economic impact on the <br />violator, therefore no reduction in penalty is allowed. <br />($0000.00) <br />Nonfeasance. This does not apply in this case, therefore no reduction in penalty is <br />allowed. <br />($0000.00) <br />6. Other Mitigating Factors. The county did ariempt to put out the fire, therefore a <br />25% reduction in the penalty is allowed. <br />1500 x 0.25 = ($375.00) <br />Page 9 <br />