My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30126
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30126
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:47:45 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 10:08:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1984014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
1/17/2006
Doc Name
GeoScience Services Review
From
DMG
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
DMO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF C~~ftADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Departrnent of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866.3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832$106 <br />/ January 17, 2006 <br />~To: Russ Means <br />From: Harry Posey, Kate Pickford S~Y~• <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION O F <br />M[NSRALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />0.ECLANATION•NINING <br />EAf FTY•ECIENCE <br />Rill Owens <br />Governor <br />Russell George <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. cottony <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />/RE: Review; Nov 3, 2005 reports and Nov 28, 2005 letter from GeoScience Services, re: <br />contaminant transport simulations for Uranium-vanadium ore bodies, Montrose County; <br />Cotter Corp., JD-6 Mine, M-1977-310; JD-8 Mine, M-1984-014, JD-9 Mine, M-1977-306, <br />& SM-18 Mine, M-1978-116 ~~ <br />--, <br />This review comprises our combined comments on the contaminant transport modeling <br />performed by GeoSciences Services for Cotter Corporation uranium-vanadium mines captioned <br />above. This review considers information from the above captioned reports, the letter, and a <br />phone conference call of January 4, 20b6 with the operator and consultant. At issue is whether <br />the contaminant transport modeling, which was based on earlier-performed SPLP leach tests, <br />provides sufficient and conservative indications that any or all of the operations do not have a <br />potential to release acid or toxic substances. <br />Back~tround: <br />"Acid or toxic producing materials" is a term defined in the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Act (C.R.S. 34.32-101 et seq.) (the Act) at section 103(1) as follows: <br />"Acid or toxic producing materials" means natural or reworked earth materials having acid or <br />toxic chemical and physical characteristics. <br />The Division considers toxic material, imthis context, to be any dissolved constituent whose <br />concentration exceeds applicable groundwater quality standards as defined in Regulation 41 - <br />"The Basic Standards for Groundwater" -established by the Water Quality Control Commission <br />(WQCC). <br />The Act at 103(3.5) defines "designated mining operation" as follows: <br />(a) "Designated mining operation" means a mining operation at which: <br />(I) Toxic or acidic chemicals used in extractive metallurgical processing are present <br />on-site; or <br />(II) Acid- or toxic-forrning materials will be exposed or disturbed as a result of <br />mining operations. ' <br />(b) The various types of designated mining operations are identified in section <br />34-32-112.5. Such mining operations exclude operations which do not use toxic or acidic <br />chemicals in processing for purposes of extractive metallurgy and which will not cause acid mine <br />drainage. <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.