My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30100
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:47:44 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 10:08:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983176
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/16/2002
Doc Name
structure agreements re AM001
From
tom schreiner
To
file
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• iii ~uiiniiim iu • <br />~~ Banks and Gesso, LLC 720 Kipling St.,Suite117 <br />.^ Lakewood, Colorado 80215 <br />(303)274-4277 <br />Fax (303) 274-8329 <br />www. banksandgesso.com <br />september 21, zooo RECEIVED <br />Mrs. Christina L. Kamnikar SEP 2 12700 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 Division al Minerals and Geology <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RE: Response to Second Technical Adequacy Review for Amendment Application <br />001 to 112 Reclamation Permit No. M-1983-176, Speer Mining Resource, <br />Asphalt Specialties Co., Inc. <br />Dear Mrs. Kamnikar, <br />This letter is being written to address Adequacy Concerns raised by your office <br />concerning the Amendment Application 001 io Regular 112 Permit No. M-1983-176, <br />submitted by our client, Asphalt Specialties Company, Inc. <br />In a letter dated September 14, 2000, you acknowledged that Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 <br />DMG. According to the September i4'" letter, several concerns in the Amendment <br />Application remain. The following is the Applicant's response to the unresolved <br />Adequacy items. <br />Exhibit E -Reclamation Plan <br />5. DMG Comment: Concern was expressed over the fact that "the Operator has <br />changed the plans for reclamation of the site from the installation of a slung wall to <br />a clay liner." A question was raised as to whelher or not the Operator "wishes to <br />bond for the entire cost of the liner, without submitting specifications for its <br />construction.° Confirmation in writing, or submittal of technical specfications for <br />construction of the liner, was requested. <br />Response: In accordance wfth DMG Rules and Regulations, the Operator will bond <br />for the entire cost of the clakli~er. At this time, the Applicant is not submitting <br />specifications for construction of the clay liner. <br />8. DMG Comment: An issue was raised over the submittal and approval of a Voluntary <br />Clean Up Plan for the reclamation of areas on the permit site contaminated with <br />pesticides. DMG requested to review Colorado Department of Health and <br />Environment recommendations and the Applicant's proposed recamation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.