My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30034
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30034
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:47:41 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 10:07:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/10/1997
Doc Name
LAND SLIDE AND WATER OUTFLOWS AT BEAR MINE SITE
From
ARCO
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dave Berry <br />December 9, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br />4. Please summarize the Bear Mine's experience with subsurface coal burns <br />and elevated carbon monoxide, from when mining began to the present. <br />Has it been necessary to shut down mining operations due to elevated <br />carbon monoxide levels? If yes, please provide details. To your knowledge, <br />where are there coal burns in and adjacent to the Bear Mine? <br />5. Please describe your excavation activities along the toe of the landslide. By <br />"excavation," we refer not only to the removal of natural material but also to <br />the removal of coal that may have been piled along the toe of the slope. <br />6. Please describe the history of slope instability at the Bear Mine in the <br />general vicinity of your mine during your years of operation. Note that the <br />current landslide encompasses three raveling slopes (that are influenced by <br />undermining due to erosion by the North Fork) and two upper landslides. All <br />of these features are readily apparent in the field and via inspection of aerial <br />photographs. What are your observations of how these five features have <br />changed over time? <br />7. MCC would appreciate the opportunity to review engineering and geologic <br />studies which the Bear Mine has conducted that focus on how Bear B-Seam <br />and C-Seam mining has impacted slope stability. <br />Please describe the geologic and engineering analysis of the current <br />landslide that you have conducted to date. <br />9. Please provide any and all of your B-Seam permeability and secondary <br />porosity data. Mr. Stover, on behalf of Bear, has suggested that there may <br />be high secondary porosity in the unmined coal block between the MCC <br />Northwest (NW) Panel sealed sump and the Bear Mine. MCC would <br />appreciate receiving any data the Mr. Slover has in this regard. <br />10. Given that the 1995 and 1996 Bear Mine Annual Hydrology Reports (AHRs) <br />describe water inflows to the B-Seam, we presume that it was necessary for <br />the Bear Mine to evaluate how this water would impact slope stability. To <br />answer this question, you would presumably need to determine how the <br />mine inflows move through the mine, where they accumulate on the north <br />side of the mine and, ultimately, where and how the water would discharge. <br />MCC is quite interested in learning the details of your evaluation of this kind. <br />Would you expect the Edwards Mine to represent an outfall for the Bear <br />Mine water? <br />11. When mine inflows were noticed at the Third West Seal in June 1995, did <br />Bear Coal Company sample these unprecedented inflows for either field <br />parameters or lab analysis? Please provide mining records, notes, photos <br />or other information documenting and recording these inflows. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.