My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30026
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:47:41 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 10:07:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/9/2007
Doc Name
2006 Report Trasnplanting Aspen on Reclaimed Coal-Mine Land Using Drip Irrigration
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Vegetation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
examined growth and survival of aspen trees planted October 2004 on reclaimed soils. <br />Half of the trees were planted on fresh roto-cleared soil moved directly to the site. The <br />other half was planted on dozer-cleared soil that had been stored for a period of time. <br />An additional treatment was added during the 2006 growing season to compare weeded <br />vs non-weeded plots. This report provides information regarding growth and survival for <br />2006, the second growing season after planting. Aspen trees planted from potted <br />nursery stock, and trees from natural sprouts on reclaimed soil were also examined. <br />Objectives: <br />The objective of this study initially was to examine the survival, growth, and water <br />status of irrigated aspen transplants on roto-cleared and dozer-cleared topsoil placed <br />over coal mine overburden material that had been replaced after surtace mining. <br />However, circumstances allowed us to expand the original study design to collect <br />growth and survival data from: 1) aspen plants transplanted from a nearby mine, placed <br />in dozer-cleared and roto-cleared topsoil within a fenced area and drip irrigated at three <br />watering levels and an unwatered control; 2) unwatered sprouts arising naturally from <br />aspen root segments that had been transported to the site in the two different soil types; <br />3) trees in plots weeded compared to those non-weeded; and 4) commercially grown <br />potted aspen seedlings that were planted in a nearby fenced area. <br />Methods: <br />The initial project was a case study of the effectiveness of irrigation treatment on <br />the survival, growth, and water status of aspen cuttings planted on a single site of <br />reclaimed land of the Seneca Coal Company II-W mine south of Hayden, Colorado <br />(Figure 1). The irrigated portion of the study was designed to measure the effect of <br />supplemental irrigation on aspen saplings that had been transplanted on the II-W mine <br />site from a naturally regenerating site on the Yoast mine where the original forest had <br />been cleared in preparation for mining. Aspen saplings between 1-2 m in height were <br />selected from this site at the end of the growing season in 2004 and pruned to leave <br />only the uppermost branches intact. In October, 2004, these saplings were dug using a <br />small backhoe and immediately transplanted into angered holes that had been prepared <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.