My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV106955
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV106955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:21:35 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:39:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/10/2000
Doc Name
OBJECTION TO CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR AMENDMENT 8
From
WESTERN MINING ACTION PROJECT
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
05i10i00 1a: a9 LRND & wgTER FUND OF THE P.OCKIES ~ 3038328106 NQ.853 D08 <br />Regarding water quality monitoring in Wilson Creek/Bateman Gulch, any ground water <br />monitoring well should be installed npgradient from the old city dump. This would reduce the <br />chances ofnon-project-related influences on the monitoring results. <br />CFV also requests that CC&V supply ail of ite monitoring data to the public in real-time form to <br />allow adequate dissemination of information to the public. This can be done over the interact or <br />similaz electronic media so that the public has access to all the raw data that the company sees. <br />F. The New External Ponds Must Be Netted to Protect Wildlife <br />Although CCBtV admits that WAD CN levels may be as high as 50 ppm in the new external <br />ponds, it fails to commit w adequately protect birds and other wildlife from the ponds. MLRB <br />Rule 6.4.20(1.6) requires "measures to prevent wildlife from coming into contact with designated <br />chemicals ...." At a minimum, pond covers to ensure that no buds would be attracted [o, or could <br />land on or in, the ponds must be required. Vague assurances that CC&V "will continue to <br />investigate additional avian wildlife protection measures for the external ponds," are insufficient. <br />Vol. I at 74. <br />TI. Failure to Eusure That the Project Complies wit4 Water Quality Protections <br />Amendment 8, with some notable exceptions, is premised on CC&V's claim that current site <br />operations are in full compliance with state environmental laws. That is not true. As admitted <br />by CC&V, the operations have exceeded state water quality requirements for a number of <br />parameters since large-scale open pit operations began in 1995. <br />For example, the Water Quality Control Division has confirmed that WAD CN levels have been <br />exceeded in the Arequa Gulch area. <br />[F)low records and sampling data taken at the two 24 inch underdrains, the North <br />Underdrain (NUD) and the Souilt Underdrain (SUD), .., confimted that the two drains are <br />the principle contributing sources to the CNwno exceedences.... <br />The complex mature of this site and the various theories as to the cause of the high CNwnn <br />values proposed by CC&V lead the Division to believe that a definitive cause of the <br />CNwno exceedences may not be identified but the heavy precipitation events likely had a <br />significant influence. <br />March 13, 2000, letter from Carla J. Lenkey, WQCD to Scott Lewis, CC&V, at p. 2. These <br />cyanide exceedences lasted "May through August 1999." Id. <br />CC&V has alsd exceeded zinc levels in the Carlton Tunnel, which CC&V admits drains the <br />project area. The WQCD confirmed that zinc levels were exceeded. "[H]eavy precipitation <br />caused a flushing condition in the native rock which, in rum, caused exceedences of the zinc <br />effluent limitatinnc fnr nutfall 002A." Id. nr n t. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.