My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV106955
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV106955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:21:35 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:39:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/10/2000
Doc Name
OBJECTION TO CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR AMENDMENT 8
From
WESTERN MINING ACTION PROJECT
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
05i10i00 14:49 LPND 8 WATER FUND OF THE ROCKIES ; 303839106 N0.853 D03 <br />Mined Land Act, requires the submission of a complete EPP for a Designated Mining Operation <br />(DMO) such as the CC&V operation. CC&V violates Rule 6.4.20's requirements for detailed <br />facility, materials handling, geochemical, water quality, reclamation, environmental protection, <br />end other analysis and performance assurances. Rule 7 requires that all of the requirements in <br />Rule 6 for Designated Mining Operations must be met before the DMG/MI.RB can approve the <br />Amendment. The following are some of the Application's most significant errors. <br />A. The DMG/MLRB Cannot Approve the Spent Ore Detoxification/RinsingFncilities Until <br />Detailed Facility Plans Are Submitted by CC&V <br />One of the critical new issues arising with the submittal of Amendment 8 is CC&V's <br />acknowledgement that the anticipated ore production exceeds the capacity of the Valley Leach <br />Facility (VLF}, even at full build-out of the VLF. According to the company: <br />The overall capacity of the VLF with the Phase N area end a maximum depth of <br />approximately 590 feet will be about 262 million tons. This is about 30-50 million tons <br />short of the expected ore production. >n order to provide the capacity required for <br />beneficiating the additional ore, CC&V anticipatcs unloading previously leached ore for <br />rinsing to a lined aeea(s}, t <br />Amend. 8, Vol. I, Project Description at p. 75. The company then admits that: <br />The location and design of the rinse area(s) have not been determined, but will be <br />submitted to the OMLR for review and approval prior to construction.... CC&V <br />recognizes that additional design details are accessary before allowing unloading of ore <br />tom the VLF. However, as part of this Amendment it is requested the OMLR/MI.RB <br />approve the concept of unloading the VLF to lined area(s) recogttiang that additional <br />details in the form of a technical revision will be submitted far final approval. <br />Id (emphasis added). The company does not even know how many of these detoxification <br />facilities it will need at the site, noting only that there may be more than one. <br />Apparently, CC&V feels that a future technical revision process fully substitutes for the <br />requirement that this Amendment comply with MLRB Rules and the Mined Lead Act. That is <br />not the law. The post-Summitville revisions to the ML.RB Rules specifically require that <br />application amendments conrain detailed plans for any facility that may handle Designated <br />Chemicals such as cyanide. These facilities aze known as Environmental Protection Facilities <br />(EPFs). The one or more "lined rinsing area(s)" noted above aze cleazly EPFs. <br />~ Based on infomoation provided in Amendment 7, the previous maximum height for the VLF <br />was 504 feet. Now, due to the need for increased capacity, CC&V claims that the VLF can <br />withstand heights of 590 feet. CC&V has not adequately explained how it has changed <br />operations to the extent that the additiona186 feet is now acceptable, For example, it is not <br />proven that the exaa height and weight of the added material, as well as volume of the added <br />leachate, does not have the potential for degradation to the integrity of the liner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.