Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />• III III III IIIIIII III • ~ <br />MEMORANDUM ////~~~~ <br />DATE: September 9, 1992 ~ 11 <br />T0: Jim Pendleton ~~~,~WWW,~/11, <br />FROM: Harry Posey <br />RE: Third adequacy review; TR-006 - Sampling and Analytical <br />Protocol; Battle Mountain Resources, Inc.; San Luis <br />Project; Permit No. M-88-112. <br />CHRONOLOGY <br />April, 1992 Rec <br />June 1, 1992 DMG <br />June 12, 1992 BMG <br />June 30, 1992 DMG <br />Sept 8, 1992 BMG <br />Sept 9, 1992 DMG <br />lived TR-006 Request. <br />sent first adequacy review <br />responded to first adequacy review <br />sent second adequacy review <br />responded to second adequacy review <br />sent third adequacy review (this document) <br />ORGANIZATION OF ADEQUACY REVIEW <br />BMG's adequacy responses have been organized according to the <br />Division's original (June 1) organization: <br />10 General comments by Harry Posey <br />14 Page-by-page comments by Harry Posey <br />1 Comment by Jim Pendleton <br />1 Comment by Jim Stevens <br />21 Comments by Dave Hyatt <br />COMMENTS <br />BMG's responses to Harry Posey's 10 General Comments ark adequate. <br />No further responses are needed. <br />BMG's responses to Harry Posey's Page-by-page Comments numbers 1 <br />through 8, 11, 13 and 14 are adequate. No further responses are <br />needed. <br />BMG's responses to Harry Posey's Page-by-page Comments numbers 9, <br />10, and 12 are addressed in the stipulations provided in the <br />following section. <br />BMG's response to Jim Pendletons Comment is adequate. No further <br />response is needed. <br />BMG's response to Jim Stevens Comment is adequate. No further <br />response is needed. <br />