Laserfiche WebLink
Walker to File C-81-019, SL-03 <br />• August I5, 2001 <br />Page 9 of 9 Pages <br />companies and any parties who commented during the process8 DMG's proposed decision is <br />published twice itt a newspaper in the locality of the miner <br />Release and Adjustment of Performance Bonds, page 2, pazagraph 5 <br />See the Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance, 15 August 2001 <br />} A copy was sent to the operator. See Rule 3.03.2(5)(a) above. <br />A copy was sent to OSM. See Rule 3.03.2(5)(a) above. <br />5 In compliance by exception as none were identified other than those listed herein. <br />e Copies were sent to the US Bureau of Land Management and to the Colorado State Land Board. <br />See Rule 3.03.2(5)(a) above. <br />A letter was sent to the surety (see Rule 3.03.2(5)(a) above). <br />a In compliance by exception as none were identified other than those listed herein <br />9 See Rule 3.03.2(5)(a) above. <br />Future Actions <br />Rule 3.03.2(5)(6) The application will undergo an adjudicatory heazing if requested. If not, the <br />proposed decision will become effective, and the applicant will be so notified. <br />Procedure 2~ Upon finalizntiot: of the bond release process, DMG should notify the operator acid <br />the surety i~t writing. The operator and the surety will be notified. <br />• <br />