My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-10-10_REVISION - M1988112 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1989-10-10_REVISION - M1988112 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 7:32:51 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:37:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/10/1989
Doc Name
APPENDIX D TAILINGS PHYSICAL TEST RESULTS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Some of the controlling factors affecting the depositional <br />• characteristics of the tailings were identified and kept as constant <br />as possible during the study. These factors as they were controlled <br />might not have been truly representative of site conditions but the <br />study required that several factors be kept as constants. <br />The bottom of the box was covered with a medium sand to a depth <br />of about .85 inch. The bottom of the box was also kept flat with no <br />grade to the discharge point of the drain sand. The grain size <br />characteristics are presented in Appendix A. <br />The box was set up as a closed environment for two reasons. <br />The first being an attempt to control the atmospheric environment <br />of the deposited tailings. The second reason was tm attempt to <br />collect any cyanide which might have out-gassed to the atmosphere <br />and pass it through a Sodium Hydroxide water bath. <br />The tailings slurry used for the box was mixed in a column <br />• ~ three inches in diameter by three feet in length. The column was <br />filled to a height of thirty inches and the column was placed above <br />the box. The bottom valve was opened and the tailings slurry was <br />discharged into the box through a manifold with four spigots. Each <br />deposition consisted of approximately 3 liters of tailings slurry <br />deposited at a rate of about 4 liters per minute with an initial <br />driving head of 6 feet. Each lift represented the total amount of <br />slurry placed in the box for a specific day. Typically 2 or 3 <br />depositions were made in any given day. The water which drained to <br />the surface of the tailings was allowed to run off the tailings <br />solids and discharge into the sand blanket. This collected water <br />was drained and collected by means of drain valves at the base of <br />the box. When the entire sand blanket was covered with railings the <br />solution was allowed to form a small pond. <br />The values of density and saturated moisture content (90) <br />obtained are presented below on per lift and total deposit basis. <br />C~ <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.