Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Ross Gubka, P.E. <br />Western Fuels-Colorado <br />February 9, 2007 <br />Page-7- <br />ownership (depreciation, cost of funds (CFC) and overhead) will apply. <br />Operating costs (fuel, Tube, ground engaging components, tires/tracks, repair, and <br />overhaul), aze applied only when the machine is working. In this case, the <br />operating costs aze 25% while the operator and ownership aze 100%. This and all <br />other tasks requiring support equipment have been revised to sepazate the support <br />equipment hours (New Task #006). <br />6. The Division has revised this cost based on 109.31 hours of explosives prep time <br />at $56.40 per hour for the bulk truck. <br />7. The Division's cost estimate was based on a 2-person crew loading with an auger <br />rig. It includes 800 lineaz feet per hour and 0.05 hours setup time per hole to load <br />the blast holes, 0.05 hours per hole to instal] detonators, primers, and downlines, <br />4001ineaz feet per hour to backfill stemming, 1,2001ineaz feet per hour to lay out <br />and secure trunk lines, 0.05 hours per hole to connect downlines, delays and <br />check connections, and 0.5 hours to clear the blast area and install access barriers. <br />Task #002 <br />1. The Caterpillaz Handbook provides a range of 0.6-0.8 for rock that is ripped or <br />blasted. We used the mid-point of this range. Division observation of blasted <br />spoil at surface mines is that the material is inconsistent in size and irregular in <br />shape, making it more difficult to handle. <br />2. The Division's cost estimate is based on an assumption that slot dozing would <br />only be achievable 50 percent of the time, which we believe to be reasonable <br />based on site conditions. <br />3. The spoil pile correction factor has been used in the Division's cost estimates <br />since 1993, when we became aware that Caterpillaz was using it in their <br />commercially available production estimating softwaze (VEHSIM). The spoil <br />pile correction factor takes into consideration the finished state of the material <br />being moved (dozing over a cliff, producing a rough finish, smooth finish, etc.) <br />while the material consistency factor takes into consideration the cohesiveness of <br />the material itself. <br />4. The material weight correction factor is well documented in the Caterpillaz <br />Handbook, and is relevant to earthmoving equipment production. The unadjusted <br />production rates for bulldozers are based on 23001bs/cy. Material weighing more <br />or less than this would affect the production adversely or favorably. To amve at <br />the correction factor, the base production weight (2300 lbs/cy) is divided by the <br />weight of the material to be moved (assuming 2900 Ibs at New Horizon), yielding <br />the correction factor (0.79 in this case). 2900 lbs/cy was taken from the <br />previously uncontested cost estimate for the New Horizon Mine. If WFC believes <br />