My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV106083
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV106083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:20:46 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:31:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/29/1994
Doc Name
EAGLE NO 5 AND 9 MINES PN C-81-044 TR 25
From
DWR
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR25
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />STATE OF COLC~1~0 <br />OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER <br />Division of Water Resources <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 <br />[)enver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone (3031 866-3581 <br />FA% 1303) 8663589 <br />November 29, 1994 <br />Ms. Janet H. Binns <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals & Geology <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RE: Eagle No. 5 and 9 Mines (Permit No. C-81-044) <br />Technical Revision No. 25 <br />Dear Ms. Binns: <br />pF' Cpl <br />.e <br />rr~ <br />Ray Romer <br />Cgvemor <br />)amen 5. Lochhead <br />Executive Director <br />Hal D. Simpson <br />State Engineer <br />The referenced request for approval of a technical revision involves drilling a 6-1 /4 inch <br />borehole to a depth of 2,150 feet in Section 30, Township 6 North, Range 91 West, 6th P.M. <br />Originally it was proposed that said borehole would be steel-cased and grouted at appropriate <br />intervals to prevent commingling of aquifers. However, in a letter dated November 16, 1994, Mr. <br />Marcus Middleton of Cyprus Empire Corporation stated that the borehole would be abandoned. <br />It was estimated that from site preparation to abandonment of the borehole would take no more <br />than '10 days.' <br />The following concerns or comments are provided for your consideration: <br />1) This office is concerned that if a confining layer is encountered, that sufficient precautions <br />will be taken to assure formational fluids are not allowed to migrate from one formation to <br />another. <br />2) Any produced ground water cannot be put to beneficial use without a valid well permit. <br />3) Plugging requirements should assure maintenancellhydraulic integrity and water quality of <br />any aquifers encountered. <br />I assume that rules and regs of DMG will address the above concerns, since statute and <br />Rule 3 of the Revised and Amended Rules and Regulations of the Board of Examiners of Water <br />Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors (August 1988) specifically excludes <br />boreholes for mineral exploration from said Rules and Regulations. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~'v,~CV~~~~~ <br />Chuck Roberts <br />Professional Engineer III <br />CR:jmg <br />6144L.cr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.