My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV105815
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV105815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:17:47 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:29:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/23/1997
Doc Name
TR 80 PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC COSEQUENCES PHC WEST ELK MINE PERMIT NO C-80-007
From
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR80
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
T <br />Technical Revision No. 80 <br />September 12, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br />4. The estimated B-Seam outcrop outflow range of 0.2 to 2.4 acre-feet per year (0.1 to 1.5 gpm) <br />is 0.1 percent to 1.4 percent of the average annual surface water and groundwater supply for <br />the colluvial "wedge" (from the B-Seam outcrop down to the valley bottom) that could <br />receive B-seam outcrop outflows, as discussed in response #21. <br />5. The yeaz-to-year, natural variation in surface water supply to the 30 acre (surface area) <br />colluvial "wedge", is 140 acre-feet to 350 acre-feet per yeaz. Therefore, the potential <br />variation in natural water supply of 210 acre-feet (350 acre-feet - 140 acre-feet = 210 acre- <br />feet) from one year to the next is 2 to 3 orders of magnitude lazger than the projected B-Seam <br />outflow of 0.2 to 2.4 acre-feet per year, as discussed in response #21. <br />6. Based on review of historic reports and aerial photographs, the majority of unstable areas are <br />located above the D-Seam, or neariy 250 feet vertically above the B-Seam outcrop. The areas <br />of instability that do extend down into the colluvial strip beneath the B-Seam are shallow "skin <br />slides" or earth flows, mudflows, and/or debris flows, which flow over the surface of the <br />colluvium, as discussed in response #21. <br />MCC believes that it will be beneficial to meet with the Division to further discuss these PHC <br />issues and MCC's responses. MCC would like to schedule a meeting on September 29, 1997. <br />Sumoina and Aandline of Mine Inflow Water <br />MCC is aware of the Division's position that, pursuant to Rule 4.05.16, it must pre-approve <br />the dischazge of water into underground mine workings. MCC does not, however, agree <br />with the Division's interpretation of this rule. In particular, MCC believes that the <br />regulation requires prior approval to discharge water from the surface or from one <br />underground mine into the workings of another underground mine. However, MCC <br />believes that it is inconsistent with both the letter and the intent of the regulation to require <br />prior approval for the routine management of water within a mine, including the movement <br />of water from one part of the mine to another part of that same mine. Moreover, MCC <br />does not believe the words "divert or otherwise discharge" apply to the routine operational <br />practices of handling water in the mine, such as collecting and storing water in active or <br />sealed underground workings within the mine, prior to discharge out of the mine. Because <br />the NW Panels sealed sump does not involve final storage or disposition of surface water, <br />nor water from another underground mine, and because the sumping of underground water <br />(or seepage or evaporation therefrom) is not covered by the phrase "divert or otherwise <br />discharge," MCC does not agree that prior Division approval was necessary for the NW <br />Panels sealed sump, nor is it necessary for the NE Panels and Box Canyon Panels sealed <br />sumps (which have not yet been mined or utilized as sumps). However, notwithstanding <br />MCC's interpretation of this rule, and without waiving our right to assert this interpretation, <br />MCC will continue to work with the Division on this PHC revision to address the most <br />recent large inflows and the PHCs of utilizing mined areas within the West Elk Mine as large <br />volume sumps. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.