Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. James Dillie <br />Adequacy Letter, Apache Mine Permit No. M78-009 <br />Page 5 <br />from collecting in the mining area, small diversion ditches wil•1 may be created to <br />carry the water around the working area and ixte return the water to the primary <br />drainage course. Disturbed area runoff water is controlled by berms and <br />either retained in the disturbed area or diverted to erosion control dams in <br />accordance with the Stormwater Management Plan. If water does collect in <br />the pits during periods of heavy precipitation, it will either evaporate or will be <br />used to irrigate adjacent land. <br />Item 6 Rule 3.1.6 states, in part, that disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic <br />balance regarding quantity or quality of water in surface systems both <br />during and after the mining operation and during reclamation shall be <br />minimized by measures, including, but not limited to; compliance with <br />applicable Colorado water laws and regulations governing injury to <br />existing water rights; compliance with applicable federal and Colorado <br />water quality laws and regulations, including statewide water quality <br />standards and site-specific classrfecations and standards adopted by the <br />Water Quality Control Commission ("WQCC"). Also, "earth dams, if <br />necessary to impound water, may be constructed if the formation of such <br />impoundments will not damage adjoining property or conflict with water <br />pollution laws, rules or regulations of the federal government, the state <br />of Colorado or with any local government pollution ordinances. " <br />Water runoff issues need to be addressed since, as was discovered <br />during a Division re-inspection trip and what was told to the Division by <br />an adjoining landowner, the drainage systems are carrying significant <br />quantities of clay particles off site (into the east branch of Brackett <br />Creek) during severe rain events. Nothing, apparently, has been done to <br />minimize this situation as required by Rule 3.1.6 RBC committed to <br />construct ditches or berms around overburden stockpiles in the approved <br />permit so that sedimentation that is present in runoff will not affect <br />reclamation areas The division did not observe any ditches or berms <br />around the overburden stockpiles during the pre-operation inspection or <br />the re-inspection of the site The operator is allowed to mine thru the <br />historical drainage areas However, there is noting in the permit that <br />stipulates how the downstream areas will be protected from excess <br />sedimentation as a result of the mining operation, except that water bars <br />would be placed in the drainage Obviously, the existing approved <br />mining plan does not adequately protect the hydrologic balance Even if <br />all the approved structures (water bars, ditches and berms) were in <br />place, the water qua/ity of surface runoff, during most storm events, <br />would be adversely affected This issue is of concern not only to the <br />