My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-04-05_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1992-04-05_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 3:56:26 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:24:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/5/1992
Doc Name
TECHNICAL REPORT & PROPOSAL CYANLDE DETOXIFICATION AT SAN LUIS RESPONSE TO 3/31/92 NOPV PRELIMINARY
From
MLRD
To
LARRY D OEHLER
Type & Sequence
TR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Battle Mountain Gold <br />NOPV Abatement Requirements <br />page 4 <br />M <br />reflect any increased reclamation cost. Any amendment or revision <br />application submitted by BMG shall include an appropriate evaluation of <br />the implications of the requested plan modifications for the reclamation <br />cost.(11> "Critical Path" Project Management Schedule <br />Common methodology and practices may serve more than one abatement plan <br />task. Multiple tasks may occur simultaneously and may impose significant <br />simultaneous performance burdens on BMG and the Division. In order to <br />recognize potential mutual benefits and to avoid conflicts and delay, BMG <br />should develop, maintain and implement one comprehensive, integrated <br />"critical path" project management schedule for the abatement plan tasks. <br />The project management schedule for the BMG abatement plan tasks may be <br />complicated. Schedule maintenance could be facilitated by the use of <br />project management computer software (ie. ON TARGET, Harvard Project <br />Management, TIME LINE, etc), which could be obtained by BMG and the <br />Division. This would accommodate efficient electronic exchange of <br />progress information. The schedule should be formatted as a detailed <br />"critical path" project management schedule. The schedule should be <br />divided into discrete task elements. <br />The description of each discrete abatement task element should include: <br />(a) Methodology and practices to be applied, <br />(b) Risk entailed, <br />(Is it proven technology, methodology perfection, research, etc?) <br />(Is it subject to seasonality, weather, equipment availability?) <br />(c) Criticality of the task element, <br />(Consequences of failure or delay for abatement progress) <br />(d) Decision points, <br />(e) Necessary relationship to other plan elements, <br />(Must it occur before or after other specific task elements?) <br />(f) Alternative methodology or practices, <br />(To be substituted if failure or delay encountered) <br />(g) Required elapsed time, <br />(h> Name of the responsible staff member(s) or contractor(s), <br />(i> Resources to be committed, <br />(BMG staff, consultants, equipment, lab), <br />(j) Required agency response(s), and <br />(Review and approval, site visit, meeting, permit issuance, etc) <br />(k) Abatement plan deadlines. <br />JP/jP <br />Doc No: 2379E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.