My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_REVISION - M1980245 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980245
>
_REVISION - M1980245 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 1:29:05 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:24:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980245
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
Exhibit I & J (Cont)
Type & Sequence
HR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• nama.2t I <br /> The soil that has been stockpiled as well as the cuts were <br /> examined for any obvious signs of poor quality zones. Soil cuts as deep <br /> as 5 to 6 feet revealed no zones that showed even slight signs of <br /> excessive calcium carbonate or other compounds that might produce <br /> questionable quality. The color and texture of the existing stockpiled <br /> soils do vary from location to location but do not indicate that any of <br /> the materials are questionable. All these materials seem to be of <br /> similar quality and the variations are within acceptable ranges to <br /> call them the same type for reclamation purposes. <br /> Stockpiling methods used to date appear excellent in that <br /> the available soil is being stripped to a reasonable depth where texture <br /> and color begins to change rather rapidly. Although windrowing the <br /> soil on the lower areas presents some possibility that clay and <br /> overburden uphill from the soil could contaminate the soil, it appears <br /> that any contamination is rather minor and of little concern. Under <br /> the circumstances I can see little other method of operating the <br /> mine in an efficient manner than is being done at this time. The <br /> current methods of stockpiling topsoil seems to have more advantages <br /> than disadvantages in that the current methods limits disturbance <br /> of more land that is necessary, provides reasonably good protection <br /> for the soil, and places the soil where it can be replaced on the <br /> regraded areas with relative ease. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.