My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV105130
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV105130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:16:41 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:23:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/15/1995
Doc Name
MINOR REVISION 150 WEST ELK MINE PN C-80-007
From
DMG
To
MTN COAL CO
Type & Sequence
MR150
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.~ <br />III Illlllllllllllll <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION Of MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmem of Natural Resources <br />1 313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 866-3567 <br />FAX: f3031 8328106 <br />May 15, 1995 <br />Ms. Kathleen Welt <br />Mountain Coal Company <br />P.O. Box 591 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />RE: Minor Revision No <br />Dear Ms. Welt; <br />Upon further review of <br />Lone Pine gulch area, <br />which must be resolved <br />II~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />dames 5. Lochhead <br />Execw rve Directrr <br />m¢hael B. Long <br />Division D~retlor <br />150; Aest Elk Mine; Permit No. C-80-007 <br />the revised SEDCAD demonstration for the <br />the Division has some additional concerns <br />prior to approval of Minor Revision #150. <br />Greystone's response to the Division's question regarding the <br />location of a silt fence on the fan bench (#1) , states that no <br />credit to water quality is recognized by either small area <br />exemption demonstration for silt fencing and they believe that an <br />element that does not contribute to the SAE demonstration should <br />not be presented as an integral element of the demonstration. The <br />Division disagrees. A SEDCAD demonstration should not be relied on <br />entirely to demonstrate that a recently disturbed area will produce <br />sediment levels below the maximum allowable level. Because the <br />area will be disturbed, additional structures such as silt fences, <br />hay bales, etc. should be utilized instead of relying only on the <br />natural vegetation to control sediment. Rule 4,05.5 discusses that <br />additional contributions of sediment should be prevented and that <br />erosion should be minimized to protect topsoil, vegetation, fish <br />and wildlife, and the hydrologic balance. Some of the sediment <br />control methods listed in this rule include retaining sediment <br />within disturbed areas and using straw dikes, riprap, check dams, <br />mulches, vegetative sediment filters, dugout ponds, and other <br />measures to reduce overland flow velocity, reduce runoff volume, or <br />trap sediment. The current SAE demonstration in the permit states <br />that best management practices of ditch feather distribution and <br />silt fences or straw bales for energy dissipation, and silt fences <br />to arrest erosion, are part of the facility. This statement has <br />been omitted from the revised demonstration and should be included <br />in the demonstration. <br />Until vegetation has a chance to stabilize the recently disturbed <br />slopes, and while construction is being completed, the Division <br />recommends that other structures be relied on in the beginning to <br />control erosion by keeping sediment within the disturbed area; to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.