My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV105128
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV105128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:16:41 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:23:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977344
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/17/1999
Doc Name
PN M-77-344-TR-06-HOLNAM INC QUARRY PORTLAND COLO
From
K-S & CO
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />6. Hydrogeologic Conditions at the Site. <br />The following discussion of hydrogeologic conditions is based on the results of a Hydrogeologic <br />Assessment of the quarry area performed in 1998. A copy of that report is attached. As part of that <br />investigation, three (3) new ground water monitoring wells, MW-5, -6, & -7, were installed at the site. <br />Ground water at the site flows through the interbedded limestone and shale of the Fort Hayes Limestone <br />and the underlying Codell Sandstone. Field observations ofcuts in the limestone indicate that the ground <br />water flows primarily under perched conditions along the horizontal bedding planes in the undisturbed <br />limestone upgradient of the areas that have been mined. In the areas which have been mined, the <br />hydraulic conductivity increases significantly as a result of the nature of the backfill method (i.e., <br />dumping) and material (i.e., broken shale/argillaceous limestone). In addition, the hydraulic gradient is <br />likely to be very steep where the ground water flows out of the face of the undisturbed limestone, as <br />observed along the north wall of Cuts 5 and 7 near monitoring well MW-6, through the crushed backfill <br />material and down to the undisturbed Codell Sandstone. At this point the hydraulic gradient becomes <br />more flat and appears to generally reflect the southwesterly dip of the stratigraphic units at the site. The <br />ground water contours for both the upgradient undisturbed limestone and the mined areas of the site are <br />depicted on Figure 2. <br />The bottom of the CICD/sludge landfills are reportedly approximately ten (10) feet above the top of the <br />Codell Sandstone. In addition, based on ground surface elevations of monitoring wells IviW-1 through <br />MW-4 at the time of their installation (1991) and current estimated ground water elevations, it appears <br />that ground water flowing through the Codell Sandstone may be on the order of 30 to 50 feet below the <br />bottom of the CKD/sludge landfilled in Cut 6. Therefore, it appears that ground water does not currently <br />flow through the CKD/sludge material. <br />Cut 6, located in the south-central portion of the mine, was recently used for landfilling the CICD. Ground <br />water monitoring wells (MW-1,-2,-3, and -4) were installed in the bottom of this cut in 1991 (see Figure <br />2). These wells were installed by the Fremont Sanitation District to evaluate the potential impact of the <br />sewage sludge disposal on the local ground water. Wells MW-1, -2, and -3 were installed in the western <br />half of Cut 6 which was subsequently backfilled with mining waste/overburden (i.e., Smoky Hill <br />KS-9903-02 Page 8 K-S &Compon7 <br />August 16, 1999 Copyrightl999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.