My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-11-24_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1993-11-24_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2021 11:00:42 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:23:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/24/1993
Doc Name
ADDITIONS TO APPROVED GROUND WATER MONITORING NETWORK SAN LUIS GOLD PROJECT COSTILLA CNTY COLO
Type & Sequence
TR8
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />' As the dual-wall drill string cases off the formation, the wells were completed by emplacing 4- <br />' inch, inside diameter, Schedule 40 PVC casing and 10-slot screen inside the 6-inch opening of <br />the center string. The drill string was pulled up concurrently as the annular space between the <br />PVC casing and borehole was backfilled with select ]0-20 mesh Colorado silica sand. This <br />technique assured that the wells were completed in the designated intervals and to total depth, <br />' without the concern of formation caving or sloughing into the borehole. The sGleci sand pack <br />was brought up to a level, above the uppermost screen, where fast water was encountered. In <br />' this way, the entire uppermost saturated interval of the Santa Fe Formation is contributing flow <br />into the wellbore. A bentonite pellet seal was then emplaced above the select sand pack and the <br />remainder of the annular space was filled with bentonite grout. Bentonite grout was chosen over <br />cement grout due to the initially high pH readings of the water samples in well M-13. Steel <br />' protective casing and locking cap enclosed the PVC casing at the surface and a concrete pad, <br />sloping away from the well, was poured around the protective steel cover. The construction <br />' details for wells M-13R and M-14 are presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively, For reference <br />and completeness, the well completion details for all the monitoring wells shown in Figure 1 are <br />' listed in Table 1. <br />Initially, the replacement well for M-13 was drilled at a location approximately 37 feet west of <br />existing well M-13. The borehole was advanced to a total depth (TD) of 177 feet, Based on <br />' the static water level in adjacent well M-l3, first water was anticipated in the vicinity of 140 <br />feet. During drilling, potential formation water entering the borehole was monitored at the ]55 <br />and 165 levels. No water had entered the borehole at either Level. Throughout the anticipated <br />saturated section, the return sample cuttings were essentially dry with the ezcepiion of a 2 feet <br />' interval at approximately 160 feet. After reaching the total depth, the drill string was extracted <br />in approximate 10 feet intervals to allow formation water to enter the borehole. The lowermost <br />' two intervals, 162 ft. to TD and 153 ft. to TD were dry. The casing was then extracted to 146 <br />feet and TD was measured to be 171 feet below ground level, indicating that the lowermost 6 <br />' feet of the borehole had caved in. This 25 feet interval of open borehole produced water at the <br />' rate of 0.4 gallons per minute (gpm). Due to this low recovery rate and its ramifications on <br />adequate ground water monitoring, it was decided to abandon this borehole and redrill the <br />' -4- <br />I~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.