Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DOMG Concern No. 4. Map 23 does not show the previously surfaced <br />mined areas as the response indicates. Please revise this map to <br />clearly show these areas. <br />Response - Map 23 has been revised to show these areas, and copies <br />b of the map are attached. <br />DOMG Concern No. 5. The Division will require that written <br />~, approval form (sic) Routt County (County Road No. 27), Yampa Valley <br />'\~ ~ Electric (powerlines) U. S. West (telephone lines) and the owner of <br />5~~` the oil well be forwarded to the Division prior to undermining any <br />of their structures. <br />Response - The appropriate approvals will be provided to the <br />Division prior undermining any of the structures. <br />DOMG Concern No. 6. Where on the shoulder of the road does TCC plan <br />to establish the 6 - 12 inch spikes for subsidence monitoring? <br />(i.e. how far from the pavement). Also the Division will require <br />two signs, one stating "Begin Subsidence Zone" and the other <br />"leaving subsidence zone", to be posted along the County Road. <br />These will be required in both travel directions. <br />Response - The exact location of the 6 - 12 inch spikes will be <br />developed in conjunction with the Routt County Road Department. It <br />should be noted that the spikes will not extend above the ground <br />surface by 6 - 12 inches, rather the spikes will be driven in the <br />ground to a depth of 6 - 12 inches. Also, it is anticipated the <br />b~ spikes will be placed in the shoulder outside of the area of the <br />shoulder that could be disrupted by road maintenance equipment. <br />The signs will be changed per the above, however, the "Rough Road, <br />Drive With Care" sings will be placed through the subsided area as <br />originally planned. Page 2.05-128(a) has been revised to reflect <br />the above. Copies of the revised page are attached. <br />DOMG Concern No. 7. The following are text or incidental problems <br />which need correction or clarification: <br />/a. Page 2.05-Sa is missing the approved language of TR-14. <br />b. The exhibit table of contents is missing 13 and 25a. <br />c. The Division request two dividers each for Exhibit 13 (a) <br />and 23(a). <br />d. Page 2.04-32 (1) should read "it may serve" and <br />"adjacent". <br />GAL e. Page 2.04-69 - Rule 4.05-6 (2) (iii) should be 4.05.6 (2) <br />(a) (iii). <br />6~,f. Page 2.05-55 (b) - Rule 2.04.4 (2) (g) should be 2.05.4 <br />(2) (g) <br />U~ g. Page 2.05-56 - 1,8 inches should be 1.8 inches. <br />h. Page 2.05-118d - Table 60 is not "Revised Predicted <br />Inflows from the Foidel Creek Mine" it is "Fish Creek <br />Stream and Inflow Investigations". Please clarify. <br />i. Page 2.05-128 (a) refers to monitoring of subsidence <br />monuments. It is not clear whether monitoring will be <br />