Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. E. Peter Matthies <br />In Table 4.4-4 the <br />but is included in <br />total for "Removal <br />of facil ities to b <br />pi pel ine. <br />-2- <br />June 4, 1991 <br />$5800 for reclamation of the pipeline is not shown, <br />the total cost. This amount shoul d be added into the <br />of Project Facilities" or listed separately. The list <br />e removed on page 4-68 shows two entries for this <br />The point of diversion from the Colorado River, discussed on revised page <br />4-31 and in Case N0. 88CW231, is located in Section 35, Township 5 North, <br />Range 90 West. The proposed pi pel ine Doint of diversion , however, is in <br />Section 6, Township 6 South, Range 90 West. NCIG must either demonstrate <br />to the Division the authority under Colorado Water Law to divert from the <br />pipeline location, or must commit to executing an appropriate change in <br />water right to the proposed pi pel ine location prior to withdrawing water <br />from the river. <br />Finally, it should be noted that a]though everything submitted with the <br />application has been placed on file at the Garfield County Clerk and <br />Recorder, the file should be identified as that for Technical Revision <br />7. The file should include all of Chapter 4, and the portions of Chapter <br />2 relating to contiguous land ownership. <br />You will be notified of any additional adequacy concerns (if any) as they <br />arise. Please contact me if you have any questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />'U(/~~~Gvv-~ ~ /(-Gtr. <br />William B. Crick <br />Reclamation Special ist <br />WBC/yjb <br />cc: Jim Stevens <br />6131 F <br />