My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV104926
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV104926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:16:24 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:22:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/29/1994
Doc Name
TR 28-DRAINAGE PLAN II FOR KEENESBURG MINE COLO
From
INDUSTRIAL COMPLIANCE
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR28
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Industrial Compliance <br />Union Tower, 165 South Union Blvd.. Suite 1000 Lakewood, CO 80228 <br />303/914-1700 FAX 303/914-1709 <br />August 25, 1994 <br />Ms. Shawn E. Smith <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />State of Colorado <br />Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />iii iiiiiiiiuiiiiii <br />999 <br />R~CF_iv~~ <br />AUG 29 1994 <br />L~.v~S:Dn c. idlnerz's & G~~:,'~c^Y <br />IC Project No. 06104389 <br />Re: Technical Revision No. 28 -- Drainage Plan II for Keenesburg Mine, Colorado <br />Dear Ms Smith: <br />Per our recent telephone discussions and Mr. Jack Epple's absence at the Coors Energy office <br />during the week of August 22, 1994, Industrial Compliance (IC) requests an extension to finalize <br />the Technical Revision No. 28 -- Drainage Plan II for the Keenesburg Mine (C-81-028). <br />Industrial Compliance understands the extension time frame is typically 30 days. It is <br />noteworthy that certain elements of Technical Revision No. 28 are necessarily tied to Technical <br />Revision No. 30 -- Postmining Reclamation Plan for the Keenesburg Mine (concurrently in <br />preparation), and must also be considered. <br />An extension necessarily will be needed to firmly establish final design protocol and <br />assumptions, as well as to address the comments in the DMG Adequacy Review letter dated <br />August 15, 1994 regarding Technical Revision No. 28. We have a scheduled meeting on August <br />31, 1994 at 8:30 a.m. at your office to discuss this revision. <br />Respectfully, <br />INDUSTRIAL COMPLIANCE <br />~~~ ~~ <br />Gary R. Lake, P.E. <br />Senior Civil Engineer <br />cc Dave Berry (DMG) <br />Jack Epple (Coors Energy) <br />/u/mjacQs/e ng/gary I/dmg-srtdth.ly <br />Denver • Phoenix • Kansas Cily • Dallas • Houston • Los Angeles • Sacramento • Little Rock • Knoxville <br />A Substliary or SP Ennronmental Systems. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.