My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-04-17_REVISION - M1977170
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977170
>
2002-04-17_REVISION - M1977170
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 11:41:39 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:15:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977170
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/17/2002
Doc Name
Response to DMG letter dated 02/22/02
From
Butala Construction Company
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
SI1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DIAL )19-339-3535 ~~~~~~ L <br />)14339b3)8 • <br />FAX )19-539-2553 ~~~a~~~y ~~~~®~f <br />POST OFFlCE BOX 90] <br />~ SALIDA. COLORADO 81201 <br />RECE~~1E® <br />APR 1 l 2U~2/ <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Apri18, 2002 <br />State of Colorado / <br />Division of Minerals & Geoiogy <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room Z15 <br />Denver, CO 80203-2273 <br />REF: Permit Number M-1977-170 <br />REF: Your letter dated 22 February 2002 <br />REF: Our discussion at your Denver office 3 April 2002 <br />Dear Jim: <br /> <br />~~~~ <br />t,c, i a~(.dt <br /> <br />~R~+%et/ ~cZ-" <br />In your letter dated 22 February 2002 you indicated the bond amount for M-1977-170 has <br />been increased in the amount of $28,150, to a total of $90,500. The due date for <br />submitting the bond increase documents is 23 Apri12002. <br />During our discussion at your Denver office on 3 April 2002 you were informed <br />regarding a potential change in ownership of the subject gravel pit. The negotiations in <br />that regazd aze ongoing at this time. <br />At that discussion there were also questions regarding backfilling the previous wash <br />ponds. Those ponds aze an integral part of the existing replenishment system for our <br />newly approved wash plant. Also, there was a discussion to not backfill those ponds <br />because they aze now a nesting and feeding azea for ducks and geese. No.decision has <br />been made regarding the final disposition of those wash ponds. Any decision could have <br />a major effect on the bonding requirement for M-1977-170. <br />The area defined by you as "The Creosote Area" is, in fact, that area defined by the EPA <br />as a "Mining Restricted Area" (MRA). No mining or excavation has been undertaken at <br />that area, and none is allowed to be undertaken at that azea. Therefore it is obvious that <br />no reclamation applies to that area, and further, no bonding amount should be assigned as <br />apart of reclamation. <br /> <br />EVERY CONSTRUCTION SERVICE <br />FROM THE DRAFTING BOARD TO THE BUILDING <br />.,.q 4 <br />~ ~': <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.