My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-01-19_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-01-19_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 10:24:01 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:14:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/19/1990
Doc Name
FAX COVER
From
STEFFEN ROBERTSON & KIRSTEN
To
STEVE RENNER
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
90 01119 14:13 3 303 965 9947 SRK. pENUER <br />• <br />BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, INC. <br />ADEQUACY RESPONSES - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION <br />PAGE 1 OF 7 <br />The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1994 submittal. <br />Please provide clarification on the difference between the two tailings <br />sample geochemica) testing results presented (L39b.4-T.0 and L396.4-T.1). <br />In addition, some explanation of the humidity cell testing program was <br />requested. Since thedata is incomplete, please commit to providing final <br />test results and developing mitigation measures if the test results <br />indicate any problems. <br />Two samples of tailings were tested as part of the geochemical testing <br />program for the San Luis Project. Sample L396.4-2.0 was an as-received <br />sample of the tailings solids which was submitted to a batch test and a <br />humidity cell test. Sample L396.4-2.1 was a sample which was rinsed with <br />rain water to simulate long term conditions of the tailings {i.e. after <br />all added buffering capabilities have been leached from the tailings). This <br />sample was also subjected to batch and humidity cell, testing. <br />Humidity cell testing for the San Luis tailings is currently longoing. On <br />the basis of the test results to date, BMR believes that no additional <br />mitigation measures are necessary. BMR will submit the final results of <br />the data to the Division. If the Division determines that a potential for <br />acid production or toxicity conditions exist, BMR will submit appropriate <br />mitigation plans within 30 days of the request for Division view and <br />approval. <br />The data for the amount of sulfuric acid to be stored on s1.e ,resented <br />in Attachment T differs from the data presented in the finerge,tcy Re:,ponse <br />Plan. Please clarify. <br />Battle Mountain Resources is currently developing preliminary mill facility <br />designs and performing a preliminary evaluation of equipment availability <br />and needs. Based on this evaluation, a standard tank size of 10,000 gallons <br />is expected to be used at the San Luis Project instead of the tank size <br />of 6,500 gallons discussed in the emergency response plan. The sulfuric <br />dtid tank will be designed for full containment in the unlikely event of <br />a tank leak or rupture. Containment of the sulfuric acid tank will be <br />separated from other containment provided in the mill design. <br />4. What corresponding volumes of spills will be detoxified by the amounts of <br />reagents stored on site? <br />Assuming a conservative ratio of 7 pounds of hypochlorite to detoxify 1 <br />pound of sodium cyanide. <br />oz <br />2,000 lbs hypochlorite/7 pounds to detoxify 1 pound of cyanide - 285.7 <br />pounds of cyanide detoxified. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.