My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV104140
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV104140
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:15:15 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:14:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/31/1993
Doc Name
RESPONSES TO ADEQUACY ISSUES SENECA II TR 26
Type & Sequence
TR26
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />for diversion construction until 1998. This permit term <br />expires in 1997. It is Peabody's understanding that only <br />facilities to be constructed during this permit term 1993-1997 <br />need to be considered in the permit renewal process. <br />The same rationale holds true for the comment No. 26 regarding <br />the 2.4 inches vs. 2.5 inches. The same response holds true <br />for comment No. 28. <br />~2~8. Please see response to comment No. 17. <br />29. The vegetation type around the old bone yard and office is <br />classified as pasture. According to soil type 27A this falls <br />into the B type hydrologic group. Assuming the lowest (worst) <br />cover situation of 30-70$ translates into a CN = 69. Please <br />refer to Attachment 7-6-7, Table 7-6-7-5 on Page 7-6-7-6a. <br />30. After discussion with CDM&G personnel it was decided that <br />monitoring of surface water runoff from these small area <br />exemption areas may be conducted in lieu of siltation <br />`~ structures. The snowmelt sampling has been completed, but the <br />rainfall has not. As soon as all sampling has been completed, <br />this information will be submitted to the Division. If the <br />results of monitoring show elevated sediment levels the <br />location, routing structures and silt fences will be provided <br />to CDM&G. <br />~1. This situation has been rectified on attached pages 12-6 and <br />YYVII 12 -7 . <br />~. The text on Page 12-22 has been modified to state water <br />quality data for the shop well are reported in the Seneca II <br />Annual Hydrology Reports. <br />~33. Page 12-37c has been revised to include the statement on <br />factor of safety. <br />,~~34. Page 12-37e has been revised to reflect the phrase "or <br />reconstructed." <br />35. The typical fill section Road B was removed because it was a <br />duplicate of the typical road section detail. The designation <br />of A, B or D refers only to typical ditch design sections and <br />j~ not to typical road sections. There is only one typical road <br />L section utilized at the mine and it is shown as a cut and fill <br />section. Exhibit 7-14 has been revised to clearly label the <br />various typical ditch and road section details. <br />36. The reference to design load of E80 was removed because it was <br />an out of date reference and no longer valid. Haul roads are <br />designed based on geometric and engineering criteria <br />appropriate for the anticipated volume of traffic, weight and <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.