Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 of 20 <br />42. Original Comment: On page 2.04-88 the discussion relating to drainage basins indicates that <br />basins #33 and 341ie outside the zone of influence of planned SOD mining. That does notf:t <br />with what is shown on the map in Figure I, exhibit SSA. Please check and revise or explain as <br />necessary. ("That may also apply to basin #4.) <br />MCC Response: Additional information was added to clarify the drainage basins. <br />New Comment: Table 1 of Exhibit SSA still shows the proposed panel E9 directly beneath basins 33 <br />and 34. Please review and resolve. <br />43. Response accepted. <br />44. Response accepted. <br />45. Baseline data was discussed in the text. Response accepted. <br />46. Original Comment: The section refers to the approved adjudication plan in section 2.05.6(3)(6) <br />but that section does not appear in the Table of Contents. Please confirm and add to the TOC. <br />MCC Response: MCC has previously included the adjudicated augmentation plan in the <br />PAP at Exhibit 52. <br />New Comment: This issue is still not clear. The newly revised text states that alternative water supply <br />infonnafion is included in section 2.05.6 and Exhibit 58. There is no information in the referenced <br />section. <br />The response to question #46 supplied by MCC states that the plan is found in Exhibit 52. Both <br />Exhibits (52 and 58) contain adjudication plans. Please clarify the relevance of those two plans and <br />remove or clarify the reference to section 2.05-6. <br />2.04.10 Vegetation <br />47. Responses accepted. <br />48. Response accepted. <br />2.04.11 Fish and Wildlife <br />49. Original Comment.• Amine plan modification requires approval by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service. They are concerned about potential increases in water depletion. Are any additional <br />water depletions anticipated from the proposed mine plan in PR-10? <br />MCC Response: No additional water depletions are anticipated. <br />