My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV103820
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV103820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:14:46 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:10:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/16/1987
Doc Name
ADEQUACY RESPONSES TR REDUCE HYDROLOGY MONITORING MT GUNNISON 1 MINE CMLRD PN C-007-80
From
WEST ELK COAL CO INC
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
TR54
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Coal Company, Inc. <br />Post Office Box 591 <br />Somerset, Colorado 81434 <br />Telephone 303 929 5015 <br />July 14, 1987 <br />RECEIVED <br />~~~ 161987 <br />MINED LAND <br />RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Susan Mowry <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />-r~ - ~s~ _ <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />Re: Adequacy responses, technical revision, reduce <br />hydrology monitoring, Mt. Gunnison No. 1 Mine, <br />CMLRD Permit No. C-007-80. <br />Dear Susan: <br />The following discussions and enclosures address <br />adequacy comments raised in your June 17, 1987 <br />letter. The attachments should be inserted in Volume <br />1, Sections 2 and 4 of the Mt. Gunnison No. 1 M & R <br />Plan on the appropriate pages. <br />Our responses to the adequacy comments are as <br />follows: <br />1. The information regarding the Upper Dry <br />Fork Flume is somewhat mis-stated in the <br />application. The Upper Dry Fork Flume is <br />located in an acceptable location with <br />respect to actually measuring the necessary <br />flows; however, the problem lies in the <br />fact that much data for the past year was <br />lost due to Beaver activity just below the <br />flume. There are two possible <br />alternatives: 1.) Move the flume upstream <br />approximately 1/8 to 1/4 of a mile if there <br />is an acceptable location. 2.) Outline a <br />program, gain the necessary approvals from <br />the Colorado ^ivision of Wildlife, the <br />U.S.F.S., etc. and have the animals trapped <br />or otherwise removed from the area. <br />Currently WECC and WATEC (WECC hydrology <br />monitoring consultant) are working to <br />determine the best long term solution to <br />the problem. There are several items that <br />must be looked at including: 1.) time and <br />effort involved with the two alternatives <br />2.) will moving the flume solve the Beaver <br />problem 3.) is there a good alternate site <br />for the flume, etc. We would like to <br />either move the flume or trap the Beavers <br />this summer (1987) however, due to a large <br />landslide across the main access road into <br />AMCO-620a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.