Laserfiche WebLink
A'urrorh,~r 1'/97 CICC-,\',;cLmcni 1'r~ld l.)ruunryr nriurr-AJinc i .7 <br />• According to Division of ~4inerals and Geoloey (DMG) Regulation 3.03.1(3)(6), no more than 60 percent oFthe <br />bond can be released until the applicant demonstrates that exishng conditions will result in equivalent or lesser <br />sediment contributions [o surface runoff when compared with pre-disturbance conditions or rmdisturbed areas. <br />The following information is provided to meet the requirements of the specified demonstration. <br />The post-mining land use for Mine 3, Blocks North and Soudt has been defined/as pastureland. Slopes average <br />appmximately 6%° in the Mine 3 North Block and approximately 2~° in the Mir1e-~ SouthBloch. ~ ~ ~ <br />/ 1 ~v /~o / <br />Three approved reference areas are located in Block South for Mine 3 including cropland, pastureland, ~and low <br />sage. The cropland referenc/area is approximately 3.4 acres with an ave ar ge slope of approximately ?P/v and is <br />located adjacent to Middle/Creek. The pastureland reference area is approximately 3.9 acres with an average <br />slope of approximately 18% and is located on the hillside east of th~mined area. The low sage reference area is <br />approximately 3 acres- with an average slope of approximately 16% and is located on the west side of the mined <br />area. v 7 <br />'_ '_ <br />Due to the ~i>;tiifican[ variability__dt topography between [he reference areas and [he reclaimed parcels, it is <br />inappropnate to develop a direct sediment vield comparison behveen [he areas [o satisfy DMG Regulation <br />3.03.1(3)(6). In [he alternative, a SEDCAD + model has been developed by CYCC to demonstrate that runoff <br />from Blocks North and South results in equivalent or lesser sediment contributions to surface runoff when <br />compared wilt adjacent undisturbed conditions. SEDCAD+ is a computer software program developed [o assist - <br />in the evaluation of stonnwater runoff, erosion, and sediment control management techniques. ~" <br />The 1995 and 1996 Block North vegetation surveys and 1996 and 1997 Block South vegetation. un~ C ^r ' <br />conducted by CYCC and available soil information from the existing permit document were utilized~as input to <br />• the SEDCAD+ program. To develop a comparative model for unmined adjacent areas, ~CYCC utilized <br />vegetation information derived from the 1995, 1996, and 1997 Cropland, Low Sage, and Pastureland Reference <br />Area vegetation surveys conducted coincident with [he Block North and South surveys! These reference area <br />` Dave been established as being representative of [he vegetation found in adjacent, unmined lands. - ~ . ~ <br />_ -- - - - - -- ~ M^1 ry . <br />{~ The reclaimed blocks and associated reference area boundaries do not coincide with watershed boundaries ~~4v' ~ <br />n therefore, representative portions of the areas are modeled on a small scale with model inputs selected as 2,-r <br />appropriate to distinguish those characteristics unique to the reclaimed sites. Grading practices which enhance <br />surface roughness,-reduce the length of overland flow, rand increase infiltration are the primary modeled <br />attributes which strengthen the reclaimed area's ability to reduce suspended solids concentrationsly~ Jd-~ °tsr~"O <br />pt- <br />t.'`` ' I o model areas with similar topography and soil types, CYCC combined the vegetation survey information for <br />r,- .I <br />'./ ~~, the Cropland, Low Sage, and Pastureland Reference Areas_with information on the topography and soil types <br />rte, ,r I determined for Blocks North and South.r The soil types and topography found in Blocks North and South are' <br />X~ ,similar [o [he soils and topography found in adjacent unmined areas. f The Combined Reference Area soil t}'pe <br />and vegetation data were modeled with the topography of the reclaimed areas [o develop a representative small <br />watershed for comparison with the reclaimed areas. By modeling comparable adjacent areas in this manner, the <br />sediment yield demonstration provides a reasonable comparison of the success of the revegetation efforts and <br />[heir effects on surface runoff and sediment loads. <br /> <br />fn~o w '~ <br />~.~ 1<r~~ <br />~Y~ [- <br />Saxxrwl~a ~ <br />is\bo n d rel \m ina)\sed\sed m ine3.duc <br />