My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV103458
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV103458
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:14:18 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:07:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/3/2006
Doc Name
Completeness Letter & Enclosures
From
DMG
To
OSM
Type & Sequence
TR15
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Biological Assessment for DMG Permit Renewals McClane Canyon & Munger Canyon Mines <br />have been found in rocky outcrops of south or east-facing slopes (Hill 1943). Midget-faded <br />rattlers prey opportunistically on a variety of small vertebrates. Long-term persecution and <br />extermination of this venomous viper out of concern for the safety of people and their domestic <br />livestock or pets is thought to have greatly reduced populations across the west (Hammerson <br />1999). Impacts to midget-faded rattlesnake in the assessment area are probably limited to <br />habitat bisection by roads and accidental road kill, although disturbance of hibernacula may be <br />possible from subsidence events. Given the limited areas of pre-existing surface disturbance <br />and level of operational activities at the mine sites, the proposed actions are not likely to cause <br />measurable effects on or jeopardize the continued existence of the midget-faded rattlesnake. <br />5.5 Mammals <br />Canada Iynx (T) is the only federally-listed mammal potentially affected by the proposed actions. <br />The lynx was listed in 2000 at Federal Register 65(58):16051-16086. Historic populations of <br />lynx have likely been extirpated from Colorado since the early 1970s. Lynx historically occurred <br />in Colorado in low numbers above 9,000 feet in the Park, Gore, San Juan, and La Plata <br />mountain ranges, and in appropriate habitat on the White River Plateau (Fitzgerald et al. 1994). <br />Re-introductions of lynx in the state have met with some success, with CDOW reporting about <br />47 percent survivorship and moderate to high reproductivity (23 possible mating pairs) of the <br />204 animals released since 1999 (Shenk 2006). Factors affecting lynx survival, reproduction, <br />and successful dispersal include certain aspects of timber management; motorized and <br />developed recreation; trails, roads, and highways; livestock grazing where understory <br />vegetation or aspen clone regeneration is inhibited; minerals extraction operations; illegal <br />shooting and trapping; and depredation (Ruediger et al. 2000). <br />No lynx habitat or primary prey base (snowshoe hare) habitat is present in or adjacent to the <br />assessment areas. Primary habitat is spruce /fir /mixed conifer / lodgepole pine forests; <br />secondary habitat is mixed deciduous /conifer forests (Fitzgerald et al. 1994; Ruediger et al. <br />2000). Designated critical habitat for lynx is currently being proposed at Federal Register <br />70(216):68294-68328 by the USFWS in portions of Maine, Minnesota, Montana, Idaho, and <br />Washington. Although no designated critical habitat for lynx is being proposed in Colorado, the <br />Lynx Conservation Assessment Strategy (Ruediger et al. 2000) provides for "lynx analysis units" <br />(LAUs), which receive management considerations similar to designated critical habitat. The <br />proposed actions addressed in this BA do no! take place within any mapped LAU in Colorado. <br />Five bat species, described in the following paragraphs, potentially occur in the assessment <br />areas. Activities in McClane assessment area potentially affecting roosting bats would be <br />occasional vibrations from subsidence, and possibly noise and vibrations from traffic in McClane <br />Canyon around the area of permitted surface disturbance. Activities at McClane and Munger <br />potentially affecting foraging bats would be evening, night, and early morning mine traffic <br />traveling across the East Salt Creek riparian corridor, and to a lesser extent, traffic traveling <br />through the areas of permitted surface disturbance. Mine haul trucks and other vehicles <br />traveling on Highway 139 throughout the East Salt Creek riparian corridor could also potentially <br />affect foraging patterns of bats. The effects of subsidence vibrations and traffic on bat <br />populations have not been studied. Whether suitable maternity roosts or winter hibernacula <br />habitat exists for large colonies of any bat species within the assessment areas is unknown, but <br />doubtful given the geology of the area. Impacts from traffic or subsidence would likely affect <br />solitary individuals or exceedingly small colonies of any bat species present, but are not likely to <br />jeopardize the continued existence of any bat species. <br />Big free-tailed bat (S). Only five scattered documented occurrences of big free-tailed bat-none <br />in Garfield County-have been recorded in Colorado, the northern limits of the species' range <br />March 27, 2006 13 Rare Earth Science, LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.