Laserfiche WebLink
Biological Assessment for DMG Permit Renewals McClane Canyon & Munger Canyon Mines <br />humpback chub (USFWS 1967), and razorback sucker (USFWS 1991). Decline of the four <br />endangered species is due at least in part to habitat destruction (diversion and impoundment of <br />rivers) and competition and predation from introduced fish species. In 1994, the USFWS <br />designated critical habitat for the four endangered species (USFWS 1994), which in Colorado <br />includes the 100-year floodplain of the upper Colorado River from Rifle to Lake Powell, and the <br />Gunnison River from Delta to Grand Junction. <br />None of the four endangered Colorado River fishes occur in or near the assessment areas and <br />the assessment areas do not occur within or adjacent to designated critical habitat. The closest <br />designated critical habitat and the closest populations of the Colorado pikeminnow, humpback <br />chub, and razorback sucker are in the Colorado River, approximately 20 miles south of the <br />assessment areas (Figure 1). The bonytail is presumed to be extirpated in Colorado. <br />Potential impacts to Colorado River endangered fishes could result from water depletion in East <br />Salt Creek, a tributary of the Colorado River (see Section 3 of this BA for depletion descriptions <br />and Section 2 of this BA for descriptions of previous Section 7 consultations on depletions). <br />Water depletions, although relatively small (a permitted average of 13.39 acre-feet per year), <br />have the potential to diminish backwater spawning areas in downstream designated critical <br />habitat in the Colorado River. <br />The Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program, a partnership of public and <br />private organizations working to recover the four species while allowing continued and future <br />water development, was established in 1988. Recovery strategies include conducting research, <br />improving river habitat, providing adequate stream flows, managing non-native fish, and raising <br />endangered fish in hatcheries for stocking. As explained in Section 2 of this BA, the USFWS <br />has determined that the Recovery Program has made "sufficient progress to be the reasonable <br />and prudent alternative to avoid the likelihood of jeopardy to the endangered fishes and to avoid <br />destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitat by depletions of 100 acre-feet or less." <br />5.3 Amphibians <br />Nofederally-listed amphibians are affected by the proposed actions. <br />Great Basin soadefoot (S). This toad is probably widespread in northwestern Colorado, where it <br />is known from several scattered locations ranging from the bottoms of rocky canyons to dry <br />basins in broad floodplains, in sagebrush, semi-desert shrublands, and pinyon-juniper <br />woodlands (Hammerson 1999). Its status in the assessment areas is unknown. The toads are <br />active during and after spring and summer rains from May through September. Breeding occurs <br />primarily along permanent streams in floodwaters, in pools along intermittent streams, or in <br />temporary pools after rainfall. Inactive periods are spent burrowed into soils. No major threats <br />are known (Hammerson 1999). The permitted areas of surface disturbance for McClane and <br />Munger directly affect approximately 10.5 acres of potential Great Basin spadefoot habitat (the <br />East Salt Creek riparian corridor, the mouth of McClane Canyon, and the Munger Creek canyon <br />bottom). Potential impacts are limited to habitat loss and fragmentation from pre-existing surface <br />disturbance and accidental roadkill. Given the limited area pre-existing surface disturbance and <br />level of operational activity at the mine sites, the proposed actions are not likely to produce <br />measurable impacts on the Great Basin spadefoot. <br />Northern leopard frog (S, SC). The northern leopard frog inhabits wet meadows, the banks and <br />shallows of marshes, stock ponds, beaver ponds, kettle ponds, lakes, reservoirs, streams, and <br />irrigation ditches. Formerly quite abundant in Colorado, northern leopard frog populations are <br />thought to be in decline in the state at least partly or locally due to competition and predation <br />March 27, 2006 11 Rare Earth Science, <br />