My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV103394
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV103394
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:14:13 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:05:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/18/2004
Doc Name
November 2004 Status Report Barker Lawsuit
From
BTU Empire Corporation
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
RN4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. The Barkers own certain property consisting of approximately 640 acres <br />located in Moffat County, Colorado (the "Property"). From 1968 to <br />approximately 2003, Empire's predecessors-in-interest mined coal under <br />the Property pursuant to a 1968 coal mining lease from the Barkers and <br />their predecessors-in-interest (Exhibit A to the Complaint). <br />4. In its Complaint, Empire seeks a declaratory judgment recognizing that <br />Empire is required by the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act, <br />C.R.S. §34-33-101 et. seq. (the "Act") to enter the Property to perform <br />certain reclamation, and declaring that Empire has a right to do so. <br />5. Empire's Complaint also seeks a declaratory judgment establishing the <br />additional compensation due to the Barkers (beyond that already paid <br />under the 1968 coal mining lease), if any, for entry onto the Property to <br />perform the reclamation that Empire is obligated to do under the Act. <br />6. Finally, Empire's Complaint seeks appropriate mandatory, preliminary <br />and permanent injunctive relief against the Barkers requiring them to <br />recognize Empire's right to enter the Property to perform reclamation as <br />required by the Act. <br />7. Empire's Complaint seeks only declaratory and injunctive relief, and <br />therefore does not allege a specific amount in controversy. <br />8. The Barkers, in their Notice of Removal, assert diversity jurisdiction <br />under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 by claiming diversity of citizenship and an <br />amount in controversy exceeding $75,000. <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.